Teams

CV-Rancho La Quinta/ D Macdonald & Ouimet

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-04vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Faith Zelenko vs Marti Jablon / Debbie Fuggetta6-4, 6-2
2024-03-25vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneWon 10
W#3 DoublesMolly Hilll / Diane Macdonald vs Janet Gugliotto / Gillen Keogh7-5, 6-1
2024-02-26vs CV-Rancho La Quinta /N AndersonSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Kristal Wilson vs Jill Day / Elaine Reddick-Cooley3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Burns / Molly Hilll vs Christina Bear / Jina Lorati6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2024-02-19vs CV-Indian Wells TG/NickersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Paula Buononato vs Monica Solis / Jane Peller6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMolly Hilll / Donna Simpson vs Joann Bailin / Monica Harrington6-2, 6-1
2024-02-12vs CV-Palm Desert TC/StolikerWon 10
W#3 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Faith Zelenko vs Kate Burn / Judy Warner6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-02-05vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesDiane Macdonald / Molly Hilll vs Marta Mykytyn-Hill / Denise Roethenmund6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSusan Burns / Molly Hilll vs Lindy Gaylord / Merri Wells1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLisa Hayes / Molly Hilll vs Karen Brown / Denise Stumpf3-6, 3-6
2024-01-08vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/S MorinWon 10
W#2 DoublesMelanie Ditton / Diane Macdonald vs Mary Czerwinski / Shelly Enstrom6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Donna Simpson
published
3.51
Paula Buononato
published
3.44
Molly Hilll
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Faith Zelenko
published
3.35
Brenda Ouimet
published 3.5
3.34
Carolyn Sewell
published 3.5
Abby Grant
published 3.5
3.23
Diane Macdonald
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Kristal Wilson
published
Melanie Ditton
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melanie Ditton + Molly Hilll314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Simpson
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
3.63
Paula Buononato
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
Molly Hilll
66W–32L career · 6 lines in 2024
66%34%<1%
3.44
Faith Zelenko
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%15%
3.35
3.5
Brenda Ouimet
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Carolyn Sewell
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Abby Grant
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Diane Macdonald
52W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Kristal Wilson
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melanie Ditton
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.