Teams

CV-Indian Wells TG/Nickerson

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesKathy Buller / Kathy McArthur vs Lorene Peirce / Karen Meyer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-03-19vs CV-Rancho La Quinta /N AndersonLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Popper / Kathy McArthur vs Jill Day / Elaine Reddick-Cooley5-7, 3-6
2024-03-04vs CV-Indian Ridge CC/S MorinLost 01
L#1 DoublesNicole Popper / Kathy McArthur vs Mary Czerwinski / Ann Morford4-6, 0-6
2024-02-15vs CV-Palm Desert TC/StolikerLost 01
L#1 DoublesCamille Elliott / Monica Solis vs Ingrid Sarapuu / Myriam Wunder3-6, 1-6
2024-01-29vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarmen Nokes / Kathy McArthur vs Marti Jablon / Janneche Nevin1-6, 4-6
2024-01-08vs CV-Sun City Palm Desert/GrovesLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanna Tipton / Kathy Buller vs Lori Greenman / Faith Ricciuti2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Elizabeth Duff
published
3.26
Suzanne Young
published
3.14
Monica Harrington
published
3.11
Kathy Buller
published
3.10
Camille Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.06
Linda Sollers
published
3.00
Joann Bailin
published
2.75
Kathy McArthur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Janice Malos
published 3
2.74
Jane Peller
published
2.33
Janna Tipton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Monica Solis
published
Nicole Popper
published
Sherri Nickerson
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Duff
12W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
Suzanne Young
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.26
Monica Harrington
14W–20L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
3.14
Kathy Buller
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Camille Elliott
62W–64L career · 4 lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
3.10
Linda Sollers
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.06
Joann Bailin
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Kathy McArthur
64W–98L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Janice Malos
29W–58L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jane Peller
24W–63L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.74
3
Janna Tipton
48W–81L career · 1 line in 2024
89%11%<1%
2.33
Monica Solis
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Nicole Popper
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sherri Nickerson
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.