Teams

CV-Sun City Palm Desert/Groves

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over - CV · CV Women 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-04-01vs CV-Mission Hills/MoskowitzLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnn Oswald / Jill Delaney vs Denise Roethenmund / Susan Sheridan0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Gianna Riley / Lesley Pittman1-6, 0-6
2024-03-04vs CV-Indian Wells TG/PlatisLost 01
L#1 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Meg Zoretic / Tammy Roach3-6, 6-7
2024-02-26vs CV-Palm Desert TC/StolikerWon 10
W#3 DoublesBetsy Blackall / Jill Delaney vs Judy Warner / Kim Cline6-2, 6-0
2024-02-19vs CV-Rancho La Quinta /N AndersonWon 10
W#1 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Jill Day / Jina Lorati7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPatricia Taylor / Jill Delaney vs Susan Caruso / Susan Hope1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Barbara Shelley / Karen Brown6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatti Groves / Jill Delaney vs Brenda Ouimet / Faith Zelenko6-4, 6-4
2024-01-15vs CV-Deep Canyon/B StoneLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Patricia Taylor vs Lorraine Booth / Darlene Dagan2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Lori Greenman
published
3.59
Linda Johnson
published
3.49
Patricia Taylor
published
3.36
Jill Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.13
Betsy Blackall
published 3.5
3.08
Terri Johnson
published
Faith Ricciuti
published 3
2.69
Ann Oswald
published 3
Lynne Prince
published
Patti Groves
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Johnson + Jill Delaney303 matchesnot enough data
Jill Delaney + Patti Groves033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Greenman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
77%23%<1%
3.90
Linda Johnson
10W–8L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Patricia Taylor
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Betsy Blackall
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
Terri Johnson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.08
3
Faith Ricciuti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ann Oswald
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
7%92%1%
2.69
Lynne Prince
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patti Groves
7W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.