Teams

Lovell/FS/CM

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-02vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Cervantes / Claire Day vs Rebecca Buchanan / Cindy Powers6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaria Lovell / Alejandra Padilla Alanis vs Glenna Gilliam / Lauren Davidson4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Gibbs / Angelica Hernandez vs Kailyn Smith / Becke Symonds4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Marcotte/FS/HOLost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Lovell / Emily Humphrey vs Emillie Vick / Britney Taake1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandra Padilla Alanis / Jessica Riggins vs Madison Geels / Teresa Williams2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAngelica Hernandez / Stacy Seeger vs Blanca Barroso / Erika Dougherty4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-26vs Morris/FS/HCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Sally Bracken vs Marcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesClaire Day / Lauren Cervantes vs Carrie Curtis / Katy Prater2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlejandra Padilla Alanis / Jessica Riggins vs April Brewer / Kristen Ferguson6-3, 6-2
2026-07-19vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesSally Bracken / Stacy Seeger vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Lovell / Jessica Riggins vs Mikelle Porter / Stephanie Neidecker6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Carrie Medlyn vs Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes2-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs Morris/FS/HCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesClaire Day / Maria Lovell vs Katy Prater / Jessica Irgens2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Alejandra Padilla Alanis vs Sydney Rebstock / Kristen Ferguson7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesAngelica Hernandez / Jeanette Mccain vs Marcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby1-6, 2-6
2026-07-08vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
L#1 DoublesLauren Cervantes / Deana Deramo vs Cindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Riggins / Maria Lovell vs Glenna Gilliam / Jan Gates6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesStacy Seeger / Katie Gibbs vs Kailyn Smith / Becke Symonds6-4, 6-4
2026-06-23vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesSally Bracken / Angelica Hernandez vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEmily Humphrey / Carrie Medlyn vs Jenny Wilkerson / Morgan Kremers6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLauren Cervantes / Deana Deramo vs Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes1-6, 5-7
2026-06-09vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 21
W#1 DoublesJeanette Mccain / Katie Gibbs vs Kristey Taake / Erin Barker6-0, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMaria Lovell / Alejandra Padilla Alanis vs Brooke Runser / Blanca Barroso6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesClaire Day / Deana Deramo vs Britney Taake / Janice Bower2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Claire Day
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.09
Deana Deramo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Lauren Cervantes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.78
Alejandra Padilla Alanis
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.58
Katie Gibbs
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.57
Jessica Riggins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.53
Emily Humphrey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.50
Carrie Medlyn
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.34
Angelica Hernandez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.27
Jeanette Mccain
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
Sally Bracken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.20
Stacy Seeger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deana Deramo + Claire Day134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claire Day
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Deana Deramo
21W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%74%<1%
3.09
Lauren Cervantes
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.03
3
Alejandra Padilla Alanis
9W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Katie Gibbs
8W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%28%72%
2.58
Jessica Riggins
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
2.57
Emily Humphrey
13W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.53
3
Carrie Medlyn
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Angelica Hernandez
9W–9L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Jeanette Mccain
6W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Sally Bracken
13W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
Stacy Seeger
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.