Teams

Morris/FS/HCC

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-29vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby vs Emma Robertson / Sharon Guzman6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesApril Brewer / Kristen Ferguson vs Cristy Harp / Morgan Kremers0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarrie Curtis / Katy Prater vs Joanna Ayala / Sara Adair6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-26vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby vs Jeanette Mccain / Sally Bracken6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarrie Curtis / Katy Prater vs Claire Day / Lauren Cervantes2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesApril Brewer / Kristen Ferguson vs Alejandra Padilla Alanis / Jessica Riggins3-6, 2-6
2026-07-14vs Lovell/FS/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaty Prater / Jessica Irgens vs Claire Day / Maria Lovell6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSydney Rebstock / Kristen Ferguson vs Emily Humphrey / Alejandra Padilla Alanis6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby vs Angelica Hernandez / Jeanette Mccain6-1, 6-2
2026-07-07vs Marcotte/FS/HOLost 12
L#1 DoublesCarrie Curtis / Jessica Irgens vs Emillie Vick / Britney Taake4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSydney Rebstock / Lexi Morris vs Janice Bower / Teresa Williams2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Shirley Vega vs Erin Barker / Erika Dougherty6-0, 6-2
2026-06-22vs Gilliam/FS/HOWon 21
W#1 DoublesKaty Prater / Jessica Irgens vs Cindy Powers / Lauren Davidson7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesSydney Rebstock / Hannah Holmes vs Glenna Gilliam / Sara Rahmani5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Vega / Desiree Reader vs Savannah Selman / Madelyn Sturgill6-0, 6-0
2026-06-18vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 30
W#1 DoublesKaty Prater / Malarie McFerran vs Britney Taake / Emillie Vick6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLexi Morris / Hannah Holmes vs Janice Bower / Erika Dougherty6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMarcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby vs Blanca Barroso / Kristey Taake6-1, 6-2
2026-06-15vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaty Prater / Jessica Irgens vs Cindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHannah Holmes / Kristen Ferguson vs Glenna Gilliam / Stephanie Selman3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesShirley Vega / Jacie Hamby vs Michelle Greenfield / Madelyn Sturgill6-1, 6-2
2026-06-10vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKaty Prater / Carrie Curtis vs Joanna Ayala / Sara Adair2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLexi Morris / April Brewer vs Jenny Wilkerson / Morgan Kremers2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDesiree Reader / Marcela Escobar vs Emma Robertson / Sharon Guzman7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Katy Prater
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.06
Carrie Curtis
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Jessica Irgens
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Malarie McFerran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Hannah Holmes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Desiree Reader
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
Lexi Morris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Sydney Rebstock
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Jacie Hamby
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.48
Shirley Vega
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.46
Marcela Escobar
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.25
April Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katy Prater + Jessica Irgens6357% games+1.1% vs expected
Malarie McFerran + Carrie Curtis6553% games−0.5% vs expected
Carrie Curtis + Katy Prater2457% games−3.5% vs expected
Marcela Escobar + Jacie Hamby404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Prater
14W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Carrie Curtis
13W–16L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Jessica Irgens
14W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Malarie McFerran
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.95
Hannah Holmes
8W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
2.5
Desiree Reader
3W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.64
Lexi Morris
16W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
2.62
Sydney Rebstock
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
Jacie Hamby
22W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Shirley Vega
10W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%55%45%
2.48
Marcela Escobar
18W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%63%37%
2.46
3
April Brewer
2W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.25

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.