Teams

Gilliam/FS/HO

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-08-02vs Lovell/FS/CMWon 21
L#1 DoublesRebecca Buchanan / Cindy Powers vs Lauren Cervantes / Claire Day4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Lauren Davidson vs Maria Lovell / Alejandra Padilla Alanis6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKailyn Smith / Becke Symonds vs Katie Gibbs / Angelica Hernandez6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-07-28vs MORRIS/FS/HCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Cristy Harp vs Lacey Kennon / Matheson Ladd6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-22vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecke Symonds / Michelle Greenfield vs Sharon Guzman / Madeline Jamison6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Jan Gates vs Morgan Kremers / Cristy Harp5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Symonds / Sara Rahmani vs Joanna Ayala / Sara Adair0-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 21
L#1 DoublesDanielle Symonds / Cindy Powers vs Mel Schaefer / Jennifer Jenkins2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Sara Rahmani vs Madison Geels / Brooke Runser6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKailyn Smith / Madelyn Sturgill vs Kristey Taake / Whitney Marcotte6-2, 6-0
2026-07-08vs Lovell/FS/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan vs Lauren Cervantes / Deana Deramo6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Jan Gates vs Jessica Riggins / Maria Lovell0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKailyn Smith / Becke Symonds vs Stacy Seeger / Katie Gibbs4-6, 4-6
2026-06-24vs Marcotte/FS/HOWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan vs Emillie Vick / Jennifer Jenkins6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Lauren Davidson vs Madison Geels / Janice Bower3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKailyn Smith / Madelyn Sturgill vs Erika Dougherty / Whitney Marcotte6-1, 6-3
2026-06-22vs Morris/FS/HCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCindy Powers / Lauren Davidson vs Katy Prater / Jessica Irgens5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Sara Rahmani vs Sydney Rebstock / Hannah Holmes7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesSavannah Selman / Madelyn Sturgill vs Shirley Vega / Desiree Reader0-6, 0-6
2026-06-17vs MORRIS/FS/HCCLost 01
L#3 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Shannon Shell vs Lexi Morris / Lacey Kennon6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2026-06-17vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Greenfield / Becke Symonds vs Sharon Guzman / Mikelle Porter1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJan Gates / Sara Rahmani vs Morgan Kremers / Stephanie Neidecker3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Buchanan / Cindy Powers vs Sara Adair / Joanna Ayala2-6, 1-6
2026-06-15vs Morris/FS/HCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan vs Katy Prater / Jessica Irgens7-6, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesGlenna Gilliam / Stephanie Selman vs Hannah Holmes / Kristen Ferguson6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMichelle Greenfield / Madelyn Sturgill vs Shirley Vega / Jacie Hamby1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 3.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Gilliam/FS/HO53121227225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Glenna Gilliam
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
2.79
Danielle Symonds
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.75
Cindy Powers
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.71
Lauren Davidson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.62
Sara Rahmani
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.42
Jan Gates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Liz Jumper
published
2.41
Kailyn Smith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Stephanie Selman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Madelyn Sturgill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Becke Symonds
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
1.84
Michelle Greenfield
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Savannah Selman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jan Gates + Glenna Gilliam3248% gamesnot enough data
Glenna Gilliam + Lauren Davidson123 matchesnot enough data
Becke Symonds + Michelle Greenfield123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Glenna Gilliam
37W–26L career · 9 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3.5
Danielle Symonds
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
2.79
3
Cindy Powers
5W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.75
Lauren Davidson
4W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.71
Sara Rahmani
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.62
Jan Gates
5W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
71%29%<1%
2.42
Liz Jumper
2W–4L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Kailyn Smith
8W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.41
Stephanie Selman
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.40
Madelyn Sturgill
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
2.5
Becke Symonds
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Michelle Greenfield
3W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.84
Savannah Selman
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.