Teams

Marcotte/FS/HO

2026 Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-30vs Lovell/FS/CMWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmillie Vick / Britney Taake vs Maria Lovell / Emily Humphrey6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMadison Geels / Teresa Williams vs Alejandra Padilla Alanis / Jessica Riggins6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesBlanca Barroso / Erika Dougherty vs Angelica Hernandez / Stacy Seeger6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-30vs Mullens/VB/CMWon 21
L#1 DoublesMel Schaefer / Jennifer Jenkins vs Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTeresa Williams / Janice Bower vs Stephanie Neidecker / Jenny Wilkerson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesErin Barker / Kristey Taake vs Wendy Mullens / Emma Robertson6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-14vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
W#1 DoublesMel Schaefer / Jennifer Jenkins vs Danielle Symonds / Cindy Powers6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMadison Geels / Brooke Runser vs Glenna Gilliam / Sara Rahmani2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesKristey Taake / Whitney Marcotte vs Kailyn Smith / Madelyn Sturgill2-6, 0-6
2026-07-07vs Morris/FS/HCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmillie Vick / Britney Taake vs Carrie Curtis / Jessica Irgens6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJanice Bower / Teresa Williams vs Sydney Rebstock / Lexi Morris6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesErin Barker / Erika Dougherty vs Marcela Escobar / Shirley Vega0-6, 2-6
2026-06-24vs Gilliam/FS/HOLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmillie Vick / Jennifer Jenkins vs Cindy Powers / Rebecca Buchanan3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMadison Geels / Janice Bower vs Glenna Gilliam / Lauren Davidson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesErika Dougherty / Whitney Marcotte vs Kailyn Smith / Madelyn Sturgill1-6, 3-6
2026-06-18vs Morris/FS/HCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBritney Taake / Emillie Vick vs Katy Prater / Malarie McFerran4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Bower / Erika Dougherty vs Lexi Morris / Hannah Holmes4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBlanca Barroso / Kristey Taake vs Marcela Escobar / Jacie Hamby1-6, 2-6
2026-06-16vs Mullens/VB/CMLost 03
L#1 DoublesWhitney Marcotte / Blanca Barroso vs Wendy Mullens / Mikelle Porter1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMadison Geels / Brooke Runser vs Jenny Wilkerson / Morgan Kremers3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMel Schaefer / Jennifer Jenkins vs Lisa Parker / Jill Holmes4-6, 1-6
2026-06-09vs Lovell/FS/CMLost 12
L#1 DoublesKristey Taake / Erin Barker vs Jeanette Mccain / Katie Gibbs0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBrooke Runser / Blanca Barroso vs Maria Lovell / Alejandra Padilla Alanis7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBritney Taake / Janice Bower vs Claire Day / Deana Deramo6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Britney Taake
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Jenkins
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Emillie Vick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Janice Bower
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.83
Mel Schaefer
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.63
Teresa Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Brooke Runser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Madison Geels
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Blanca Barroso
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.33
Erika Dougherty
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.22
Kristey Taake
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.08
Whitney Marcotte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.02
Erin Barker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emillie Vick + Britney Taake8362% games+15.9% vs expected
Madison Geels + Brooke Runser3252% games+6.0% vs expected
Mel Schaefer + Jennifer Jenkins123 matchesnot enough data
Erin Barker + Kristey Taake123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Britney Taake
20W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%12%
3.33
Jennifer Jenkins
14W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Emillie Vick
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Janice Bower
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
2.94
Mel Schaefer
12W–20L career · 5 lines in 2026
89%11%<1%
2.83
Teresa Williams
11W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Brooke Runser
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
Madison Geels
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Blanca Barroso
9W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Erika Dougherty
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
2.33
Kristey Taake
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Whitney Marcotte
6W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Erin Barker
2W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.