Teams

KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 WOMEN

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDLost 12
W#1 SinglesAmber Bowling vs Mary Jennings6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLindsey Underhill vs Carrie Merrill3-6, 3-6
L#3 SinglesTamela Triplett vs Kelley Roberts2-6, 0-6
2026-08-13vs KY/LOU/SMITHWon 20
W#1 SinglesErin Ash vs Shannon Burnett6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKristine Holthouser vs Andrea Smith6-2, 6-1
2026-08-05vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONWon 30
W#1 SinglesErin Ash vs Alexandra Lewis6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesTatiana Pobst vs Diana Hoagland7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAshley Wilhem vs Carolyn Moore6-4, 6-0
2026-07-28vs KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDYWon 21
W#1 SinglesErin Ash vs Danielle Hallion6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLindsey Underhill vs Lily McDonogh0-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAmber Bowling vs Abigail Stewart7-6, 6-0
2026-07-20vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONEWon 30
W#1 SinglesAshley Butler vs Brooke Bloch6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAshley Wilhem vs Helen Lindner6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKristine Holthouser vs Lilly McGlone6-3, 6-0
2026-07-08vs KY/LOU/MORRISLost 12
L#1 SinglesTatiana Pobst vs Cassidy McCracken0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesAbbey Heird vs Stacey Gilmore6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesTamela Triplett vs Laura Neely1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING41123884
2KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD4111412120
3KY/LOU/MORRIS31751087
4KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDY32961299
5KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSON135716115
6KY/LOU/SMITH1421326160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Erin Ash
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.38
Abbey Heird
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Amber Bowling
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Tatiana Pobst
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.29
Ashley Wilhem
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Ashley Butler
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Lindsey Underhill
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.19
Kristine Holthouser
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.70
Tamela Triplett
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Erin Ash
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%24%
3.40
3.5
Abbey Heird
15W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Amber Bowling
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
Tatiana Pobst
19W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Ashley Wilhem
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Ashley Butler
9W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Lindsey Underhill
9W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
Kristine Holthouser
17W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
Tamela Triplett
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.