Teams

KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 WOMEN

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLINGWon 21
L#1 SinglesMary Jennings vs Amber Bowling2-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesCarrie Merrill vs Lindsey Underhill6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesKelley Roberts vs Tamela Triplett6-2, 6-0
2026-08-17vs KY/LOU/SMITHWon 30
W#1 SinglesKathleen Renda vs Kristy Dugan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMary Jennings vs Soojung Jung6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesStephanie Metten vs Erin Sexton6-2, 6-1
2026-08-13vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONSplit 11
L#1 SinglesSarah Gorman vs Alexandra Lewis3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesStephanie Metten vs Shannon Kessler7-6, 6-4
2026-08-05vs KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDYWon 21
W#1 SinglesKathleen Renda vs Katharine Rivers6-3, 6-4
W#2 SinglesBridgette Gorman vs Staci Fountain6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCarrie Merrill vs Abigail Stewart3-6, 3-6
2026-07-28vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONEWon 30
W#1 SinglesBridgette Gorman vs Joanna Agin3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesStephanie Saxton vs Brooke Ault6-3, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSarah Gorman vs Helen Lindner6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-07-20vs KY/LOU/MORRISLost 12
L#1 SinglesBrooke Wachtel vs Ashley Dehner2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesMary Jennings vs Emily Irwin6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesHannah Sencindiver vs Alissa Sample4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING41123884
2KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD4111412120
3KY/LOU/MORRIS31751087
4KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDY32961299
5KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSON135716115
6KY/LOU/SMITH1421326160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Bridgette Gorman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
Kathleen Renda
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Carrie Merrill
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Mary Jennings
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.18
Sarah Gorman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.17
Stephanie Saxton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.16
Kelley Roberts
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
3.13
Stephanie Metten
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
3.09
Brooke Wachtel
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.90
Hannah Sencindiver
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridgette Gorman + Mary Jennings3255% games+10.9% vs expected
Kelley Roberts + Carrie Merrill303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Bridgette Gorman
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.36
Kathleen Renda
48W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
3.36
3.5
Carrie Merrill
30W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Mary Jennings
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Sarah Gorman
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
Stephanie Saxton
36W–28L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%11%89%
3.17
Kelley Roberts
33W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.16
Stephanie Metten
15W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Brooke Wachtel
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Hannah Sencindiver
14W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.