Teams

KY/LOU/MORRIS

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.17 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs KY/LOU/SMITHLost 02
L#1 SinglesAlissa Sample vs Smitha Bullock2-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesEden Hottell vs Linda Ross4-6, 0-6
2026-08-17vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONWon 21
W#1 SinglesCassidy McCracken vs Carolyn Moore6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLaura Neely vs Rosmond Dolen7-5, 6-4
L#3 SinglesEden Hottell vs Robbyn McClain6-7, 2-3
2026-08-13vs KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDYLost 12
L#1 SinglesAshley Dehner vs Morgan Robertson4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAlissa Sample vs Katharine Rivers3-2
L#3 SinglesEden Hottell vs Hannah Hardy1-6, 1-6
2026-08-05vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONESplit 11
W#1 SinglesCassidy McCracken vs Adrienne Polen6-4, 6-4
L#2 SinglesLaura Neely vs Helen Lindner3-6, 3-6
2026-07-20vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDWon 21
W#1 SinglesAshley Dehner vs Brooke Wachtel6-2, 6-0
L#2 SinglesEmily Irwin vs Mary Jennings2-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAlissa Sample vs Hannah Sencindiver6-4, 6-3
2026-07-08vs KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLINGWon 20
W#1 SinglesCassidy McCracken vs Tatiana Pobst6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesLaura Neely vs Tamela Triplett6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING41123884
2KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD4111412120
3KY/LOU/MORRIS31751087
4KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDY32961299
5KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSON135716115
6KY/LOU/SMITH1421326160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ashley Dehner
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Cassidy McCracken
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Laura Neely
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.98
Alissa Sample
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.98
Emily Irwin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
Cammie King
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.65
Eden Hottell
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Kylie Barron
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ashley Dehner
68W–28L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Cassidy McCracken
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%85%14%
3.36
Laura Neely
27W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Alissa Sample
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Emily Irwin
30W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%55%44%
2.98
3
Cammie King
22W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
2.69
3
Eden Hottell
10W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
Kylie Barron
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.