Teams

KY/LOU/SMITH

2026 USTA SINGLES 18 & OVER ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.5 WOMEN

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-25vs KY/LOU/MORRISWon 10
W#1 SinglesSmitha Bullock vs Alissa Sample6-2, 6-4
2026-08-17vs KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLDLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristy Dugan vs Kathleen Renda2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSoojung Jung vs Mary Jennings3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 SinglesErin Sexton vs Stephanie Metten2-6, 1-6
2026-08-13vs KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLINGLost 01
L#1 SinglesShannon Burnett vs Erin Ash1-6, 1-6
2026-07-28vs KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSONLost 01
L#3 SinglesErin Sexton vs Robbyn McClain6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-20vs KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDYLost 03
L#1 SinglesErin Sexton vs Morgan Robertson0-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesShannon Burnett vs Mary Kate Shain2-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCatherine Werner vs Danielle Hallion0-6, 1-6
2026-07-08vs KY/LOU/AGIN/MCGLONEWon 10
W#3 SinglesKristy Dugan vs Haley Baker6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 3.5 WOMEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/UNDERHILL/BOWLING41123884
2KY/LOU/ROBERTS/MANGOLD4111412120
3KY/LOU/MORRIS31751087
4KY/LOU/SHAIN/HARDY32961299
5KY/LOU/FRENCH/WILSON135716115
6KY/LOU/SMITH1421326160

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Soojung Jung
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Smitha Bullock
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.12
Alexandra Deal
published 3.5
3.07
Kristy Dugan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.98
Erin Sexton
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Allison Luckett
published 3
2.88
Shannon Burnett
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Catherine Werner
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Luckett + Kristy Dugan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Soojung Jung
33W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
Smitha Bullock
25W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Alexandra Deal
60W–38L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.12
Kristy Dugan
38W–51L career · 2 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
Erin Sexton
11W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Allison Luckett
58W–52L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
Shannon Burnett
16W–67L career · 2 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.88
3
Catherine Werner
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.