Teams

7-AYoung-EV

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening

9 players · average NTRP 3.08 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-29Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Christina Pipkin vs AnneSophie Dorey / Caroline Irish2-6, 4-6
2022-09-15vs 6-SBrogden-Eno- 18+ 6.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKellie Johnson / Kristin Isaacs vs Deb Lanier / Berna Tareen2-6, 0-6
2022-09-08vs 3-KDonica-ENOLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmi Young / Kelly Conklin vs Sarah Franks / Wendy Lindberg6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKelly Travis / Kristin Isaacs vs Courtney Carey / Katherine Beall4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Dubois / Emily Ryan vs Jennifer Magee / Gretchen LoFrese0-6, 3-6
2022-09-06vs 5-MSanchez-Eno-18 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmi Young / Kelly Conklin vs Mary Jo Dunnington / Kolleen Fitzgerald2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Dubois / Laura Cannon vs Lauren Redmond / Hannah White1-6, 1-6
2022-08-16vs 4-MMiller-CHTCLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Pipkin / Kelly Conklin vs Karen Wood / Sarah Towles0-6, 1-6
2022-08-09vs 1-MLong-ENO-18+ 6.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmanda Pierce / Kristin Isaacs vs Tammy Chin / Megan Chiles1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Dubois / Christina Pipkin vs Allison Taylor / MaryJo McNeill2-6, 3-6
2022-08-04vs 2-ECurry-SVCLost 02
L#2 DoublesKristin Isaacs / Kelly Conklin vs Kay Jordan / Laura Caldwell1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Ryan / Laura Dubois vs Lisa Simmons / Melinda Wright0-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 6.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.25
Amanda Pierce
published 3.5
3.20
Kelly Travis
published
3.06
Christina Pipkin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.94
Ami Young
published 3
2.89
Kelly Conklin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3
2.79
Kristin Isaacs
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 42% · published 3
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.56
Laura Dubois
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Jesse Banks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Dubois + Kelly Conklin7454% games+9.0% vs expected
Kristin Isaacs + Laura Dubois303 matchesnot enough data
Laura Dubois + Christina Pipkin123 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Conklin + Christina Pipkin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amanda Pierce
9W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Travis
41W–36L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
3
Christina Pipkin
86W–65L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Ami Young
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Kelly Conklin
71W–81L career · 10 lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Kristin Isaacs
111W–164L career · 12 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
2.79
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2022
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Laura Dubois
82W–106L career · type A · 9 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
2.56
Jesse Banks
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.