Teams

CDTA S 40&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Hans Sat 1 $30

1Summer 40&O WN · WE

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#2 DoublesLisa Lowenthal / Noreen Ohcana vs Kim Kuwabara / Laura Purcell1-6, 6-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLisa Hans / Hillary Cohen vs Amy Byrne / Shelley Szela2-6, 4-5
W#1 SinglesDace Lilo vs Annalisa Tsai6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNoreen Ohcana / Mardi Scott vs Michelle Ramker / Suzanne Losasso3-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSally Washlow / Noreen Ohcana vs Colleen Chionis / Leigh Keyser2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLindsay Goodman / Lisa Hans vs Sara Olson / Erica White3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $226020410126
2CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $226020411122
3CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22512138124
4CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $295120413121
5CDTA S 40&OW4.0 3.SBC Gray Sat 9 $273291124183
6CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $2733121225186
7CDTA S 40&OW4.0 7.Hins Cashman Tue 6:30 $221461432202
8CDTA S 40&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Hans Sat 1 $301451533214
9CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $221561837229
10CDTA S 40&OW4.0 11.FV Hayashida Sat 11 $250502040237
11CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $270651939265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Turdo
published 4.5
3.84
Hillary Cohen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.80
Johanna Raimond
published 4
3.76
Lisa Lowenthal
published 4
Dayle Levine
published 4
3.75
Sally Washlow
published 4
3.72
Tina Werber
published 3.5
3.67
Alison Morimoto
published 4
3.65
Lindsay Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Margo Carvell
published 3.5
3.64
Dace Lilo
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.60
Youngran Chung
published 4
3.60
Tracy Meyer
published
3.46
3.43
Noreen Ohcana
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.34
Lisa Hans
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.25
Mardi Scott
published 3.5
3.13
Emma Lee
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
2.99
Nicole Putzel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracy Meyer + Lindsay Goodman4453% games+8.1% vs expected
Tracy Meyer + Tina Werber231356% games+7.5% vs expected
Noreen Ohcana + Sally Washlow4451% games+3.7% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Margo Carvell12855% games+2.6% vs expected
Lisa Hans + Johanna Raimond3448% games+1.5% vs expected
Noreen Ohcana + Lisa Lowenthal2838% games−0.1% vs expected
Johanna Raimond + Sally Washlow4251% games−3.1% vs expected
Youngran Chung + Lisa Hans4743% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christina Turdo
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Hillary Cohen
32W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.84
4
Johanna Raimond
103W–71L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Lisa Lowenthal
20W–54L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Dayle Levine
22W–10L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Sally Washlow
129W–161L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Tina Werber
131W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.72
4
Alison Morimoto
37W–26L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.67
Lindsay Goodman
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Margo Carvell
139W–96L career · no lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.65
4
Dace Lilo
12W–41L career · 1 line in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.64
4
Youngran Chung
76W–87L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
Tracy Meyer
76W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.60
4
Pamela Leichtling
49W–113L career · no lines in 2026
63%37%<1%
3.46
Noreen Ohcana
66W–95L career · 3 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.43
Lisa Hans
71W–103L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
Mardi Scott
6W–15L career · type S · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Emma Lee
37W–49L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
Nicole Putzel
17W–30L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
2.99

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.