Teams

CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $22

1Summer 40&O WN · WE

22 players · average NTRP 3.94 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#2 DoublesKim Kuwabara / Laura Purcell vs Lisa Lowenthal / Noreen Ohcana6-1, 5-6, 1-0
2026-06-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesRebecca Daly / Gail Wilson vs Robin Ford / Erin Paul3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDawn Baumann / Rebecca Daly vs Laurie Gray / Gayle Dominicis5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $226020410126
2CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $226020411122
3CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22512138124
4CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $295120413121
5CDTA S 40&OW4.0 3.SBC Gray Sat 9 $273291124183
6CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $2733121225186
7CDTA S 40&OW4.0 7.Hins Cashman Tue 6:30 $221461432202
8CDTA S 40&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Hans Sat 1 $301451533214
9CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $221561837229
10CDTA S 40&OW4.0 11.FV Hayashida Sat 11 $250502040237
11CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $270651939265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Marie Reece
published 4
4.20
Tracy Reece
published 4
4.13
Kim Kuwabara
published 4
4.03
Ana Chang
published 4
3.99
Christine Munteanu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.95
Haina Shin
published 4
3.95
Dawn Baumann
published 4
3.77
Gail Wilson
published 4
3.71
3.69
Laura Purcell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Emily Lund
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Hilary Fife
published 4
3.59
Sue Wissing
published 4
3.58
Heather Hayden
published 4
3.56
Amy Antoniolli
published 4
3.51
Silvie Fankhauser
published
3.51
Rebecca Daly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
3.43
Alja Hessami-Maas
published 3.5
3.33
Agnieszka Fijol
published 3.5
Jendy Barnes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Agnieszka Fijol + Emily Lund7065% games+13.1% vs expected
Marjorie Baltazar + Sarah Blankenbaker5558% games+11.5% vs expected
Marie Reece + Tracy Reece52769% games+9.1% vs expected
Alja Hessami-Maas + Sarah Blankenbaker7459% games+8.3% vs expected
Dawn Baumann + Christine Munteanu14164% games+8.2% vs expected
Alja Hessami-Maas + Emily Lund23662% games+8.0% vs expected
Sarah Blankenbaker + Christine Munteanu221554% games+7.1% vs expected
Ana Chang + Tracy Reece9166% games+5.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marie Reece
180W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
4.22
4
Tracy Reece
104W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
4.20
4
Kim Kuwabara
174W–33L career · no lines in 2026
<1%16%84%
4.13
4
Ana Chang
210W–115L career · no lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
4.03
4
Christine Munteanu
89W–95L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Haina Shin
290W–131L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Dawn Baumann
397W–165L career · no lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.95
4
Andrea Galligan Kuc
105W–116L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gail Wilson
25W–44L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Sarah Blankenbaker
175W–175L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
Laura Purcell
158W–161L career · 1 line in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Emily Lund
256W–130L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
4
Hilary Fife
107W–70L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.60
4
Sue Wissing
64W–48L career · no lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Heather Hayden
7W–20L career · no lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Amy Antoniolli
33W–44L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Silvie Fankhauser
9W–17L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
Rebecca Daly
129W–147L career · 2 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Marjorie Baltazar
183W–85L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Alja Hessami-Maas
214W–213L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Agnieszka Fijol
130W–118L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Jendy Barnes
41W–45L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.