Teams

CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $22

1Summer 40&O WN · WE

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Joanne Lund vs Erika Matsumoto / Yumi Ida6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKrista Klund vs Iva Gregorova7-5, 2-2
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Erica White vs Cara Waddle / Desiree Witte6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMiriam Abe vs Denise Lam6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Mira Struck vs Virginia Kosenkova / Jennifer Nemec6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSara Olson / Erica White vs Lindsay Goodman / Lisa Hans6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $226020410126
2CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $226020411122
3CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22512138124
4CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $295120413121
5CDTA S 40&OW4.0 3.SBC Gray Sat 9 $273291124183
6CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $2733121225186
7CDTA S 40&OW4.0 7.Hins Cashman Tue 6:30 $221461432202
8CDTA S 40&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Hans Sat 1 $301451533214
9CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $221561837229
10CDTA S 40&OW4.0 11.FV Hayashida Sat 11 $250502040237
11CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $270651939265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Mira Struck
published 4
3.93
Leigh Keyser
published 4
3.93
Sara Desai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.83
Rebecca Kosner
published 4
3.80
Joanne Lund
published 4
3.76
Miriam Abe
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.75
Sara Olson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Colleen Chionis
published 4
3.58
Krista Klund
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.56
Andrea Carrier
published 4
3.56
Linh Bailey
published 4
3.54
Janine Sheridan
published 4
3.49
Yarina Birnbaum
published 4
3.31
Jane Moon
published
Erica White
published
Michelle Parks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leigh Keyser + Sara Desai12362% games+8.7% vs expected
Yarina Birnbaum + Joanne Lund18363% games+4.0% vs expected
Linh Bailey + Joanne Lund4158% games+3.7% vs expected
Janine Sheridan + Joanne Lund4847% games−5.8% vs expected
Janine Sheridan + Yarina Birnbaum224 matchesnot enough data
Linh Bailey + Andrea Carrier314 matchesnot enough data
Andrea Carrier + Joanne Lund314 matchesnot enough data
Sara Olson + Joanne Lund314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Mira Struck
41W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Leigh Keyser
98W–48L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Sara Desai
55W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.93
4
Rebecca Kosner
96W–53L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.83
4
Joanne Lund
172W–88L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
Miriam Abe
60W–54L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Sara Olson
131W–57L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.75
4
Colleen Chionis
180W–187L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.74
Krista Klund
26W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.58
4
Andrea Carrier
19W–24L career · no lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Linh Bailey
56W–52L career · no lines in 2026
35%65%<1%
3.56
4
Janine Sheridan
65W–64L career · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
4
Yarina Birnbaum
69W–62L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
Jane Moon
28W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
Erica White
63W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Michelle Parks
45W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.