Teams

CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $22

1Summer 40&O WN · WE

19 players · average NTRP 3.68 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Beu / Kelly Golden vs Laurie Gray / KAREN MAJERCZAK6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings11 teams · WE
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA S 40&OW4.0 2.Tam Lund Thu 7 $226020410126
2CDTA S 40&OW4.0 8.Nielsen Sheridan Sat 4 $226020411122
3CDTA S 40&OW4.0 4.Tam Corey Sun 11 $22512138124
4CDTA S 40&OW4.0 9.MTB Meng Tue 6:30 $295120413121
5CDTA S 40&OW4.0 3.SBC Gray Sat 9 $273291124183
6CDTA S 40&OW4.0 10.RT Jasinski Tue 7 $2733121225186
7CDTA S 40&OW4.0 7.Hins Cashman Tue 6:30 $221461432202
8CDTA S 40&OW4.0 5.Gnbk Hans Sat 1 $301451533214
9CDTA S 40&OW4.0 1.Nielsen Burnside Sat 4 $221561837229
10CDTA S 40&OW4.0 11.FV Hayashida Sat 11 $250502040237
11CDTA S 40&OW4.0 6.RT Fuller Sun 12 $270651939265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Tiffany Carpenter
published
3.92
Suzanne Beu
published 4
3.71
Meshelle Rich
published 4
3.66
Kelly Golden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Hilary Hoye
published 4
3.65
Laurie Schachman
published 4
3.64
Katie Burnside
published 4
3.50
Lyndsay Cavanagh
published 3.5
3.42
Apple Naughton
published 3.5
3.42
Cheryl Ingram
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.41
Abby Sarnoff
published 3.5
3.39
Jessica Gross
published 3.5
3.26
Rosa Broseman
published 3.5
3.25
Denise Schneider
published 3.5
3.25
Rebecca Wadman
published 3.5
3.25
Robin Ford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.23
Ren Fata
published
3.02
Ann Weller
published 3.5
Stefanie Turner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Schneider + Rebecca Wadman5454% games+17.7% vs expected
Suzanne Beu + Hilary Hoye5268% games+15.3% vs expected
Rosa Broseman + Robin Ford3447% games+7.4% vs expected
Hilary Hoye + Rebecca Wadman4539% games+5.0% vs expected
Katie Burnside + Kelly Golden291954% games+4.8% vs expected
Jessica Gross + Meshelle Rich17563% games+0.6% vs expected
Rosa Broseman + Apple Naughton5554% games−4.5% vs expected
Robin Ford + Cheryl Ingram4556% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tiffany Carpenter
19W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Suzanne Beu
55W–48L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Meshelle Rich
38W–15L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.71
Kelly Golden
48W–27L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
4
Hilary Hoye
82W–55L career · no lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Laurie Schachman
11W–10L career · no lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
4
Katie Burnside
74W–32L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.64
3.5
Lyndsay Cavanagh
124W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Apple Naughton
225W–194L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Cheryl Ingram
107W–67L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Abby Sarnoff
52W–45L career · no lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.41
3.5
Jessica Gross
74W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Rosa Broseman
57W–38L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Denise Schneider
101W–70L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Rebecca Wadman
33W–20L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Robin Ford
60W–50L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
Ren Fata
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
3.23
3.5
Ann Weller
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Stefanie Turner
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.