Teams

Match Marvels

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.25 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-05-11vs Like a Fine WineWon 30
W#1 SinglesTisha Purdy vs Kerry Freeman6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJill Mckinney / Lora Bonser vs Nancy Gordon / Nancy Middleton6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Lorinda Harris vs Kim Custer / Frances Stern Dudley6-1, 6-0
2021-05-06vs Baby’s got BackhandWon 10
W#3 DoublesLorinda Harris / Laura Barton vs Michele Bowden / Sandra Healy6-2, 6-0
2021-05-04vs SwingersWon 10
W#1 SinglesTisha Purdy vs Deborah Whipple7-6, 7-6
2021-04-27vs Hot FlashesLost 01
L#3 DoublesTisha Purdy / Jill Mckinney vs Heidi Friend / Karen Sheehan5-7, 1-6
2021-04-20vs Volley GirlzLost 01
L#3 DoublesLorinda Harris / Natalie Carlise vs Loria Sylvia / Kathy Hansen3-6, 3-6
2021-04-13vs Diva ThunderSplit 11
L#2 DoublesNatalie Carlise / Michelle McSorley vs Deanna Schmidt / Diane Kopp0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesLora Bonser / Laura Barton vs Molly Harder / Lisa Veis6-4, 6-2
2021-04-08vs Red DragonsWon 10
W#1 SinglesTisha Purdy vs Shelley Akamatsu6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Volley Girlz10135922278
2Match Marvels92321227294
3Red Dragons65251944374
4Causing a Racquet65232148356
5Swingers65212350391
6Net Sisters56202452391
7Like a Fine Wine29123267469
8Diva Thunder110113372460
9Baby’s got Backhand01134184514

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.39
Molly Otter
published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.10
Dyan Goulet
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.10
Lori Hosac
published 3.5
3.00
2.87
Laurie Nowierski
published 3
2.80
Teresa Lyon
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
2.67
Lorinda Harris
published 3
Jill Mckinney
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Laura Barton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Natalie Carlise
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tisha Purdy
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Hosac + Stephanie Churchman11359% games+9.4% vs expected
Dyan Goulet + Stephanie Churchman12661% games+4.4% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Lora Bonser8361% games+4.2% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Stephanie Churchman9654% games−6.0% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Lori Hosac17659% games−6.2% vs expected
Laurie Nowierski + Michelle McSorley4550% games−7.5% vs expected
Dyan Goulet + Lori Hosac81245% games−24.8% vs expected
Teresa Lyon + Jill Mckinney18860% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Molly Otter
136W–82L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dyan Goulet
60W–69L career · 14 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Lori Hosac
101W–89L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Michelle McSorley
72W–49L career · no lines in 2021
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Laurie Nowierski
65W–40L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Teresa Lyon
167W–112L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Lorinda Harris
11W–10L career · no lines in 2021
10%90%1%
2.67
Jill Mckinney
67W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Laura Barton
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data
Natalie Carlise
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Tisha Purdy
47W–45L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.