Teams

Berlin/Pool 3.0W 18s Fri AM

2024 Piedmont USTA 18 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Molly Norris
published
3.37
Deirdre Hjelt
published 3.5
3.30
Stacey Russo
published
3.29
Jen Berlin
published
3.23
Amy Bunch
published 3.5
3.18
Jeanie Reynolds
published
3.14
Allison Pool
published 3.5
2.99
Stephanie Adams
published
2.95
Jessica Neal
published
2.88
2.82
Evie Curley
published
Melody Davis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Molly Norris + Stacey Russo7261% games+10.0% vs expected
Allison Pool + Jen Berlin2440% games−2.1% vs expected
Stacey Russo + Stephanie Adams2341% games−5.3% vs expected
Molly Norris + Jen Berlin4248% gamesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Allison Pool224 matchesnot enough data
Deirdre Hjelt + Jen Berlin224 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Amy Bunch303 matchesnot enough data
Jeanie Reynolds + Jen Berlin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Molly Norris
19W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%76%23%
3.40
3.5
Deirdre Hjelt
54W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Stacey Russo
21W–18L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Jen Berlin
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.29
3.5
Amy Bunch
31W–35L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%2%
3.23
Jeanie Reynolds
37W–27L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Allison Pool
9W–16L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
Stephanie Adams
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
<1%54%46%
2.99
Jessica Neal
18W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Caroline DeVillers
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
2.88
Evie Curley
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
Melody Davis
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.