Teams

Evans/GR 3.0-4.0

2025 TUL TRI-LEVEL NIGHT 18 & Over League · WOMEN 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-19vs Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesTuesday Evers / Michelle Leonard vs Lori Buechler / Jennifer Sloan6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTracy Earls / Shannon Faulkner vs Devon Chatley / Haley Schroedter4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSandy Hightower / Michelle Carabello vs Molly McCormick / Ashleigh Boedeker6-2, 6-3
2025-08-18vs Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSandra Leos / Natalie Spreiter vs Dona Zanotti / Betsy Bryce7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTracy Earls / Eden Evans vs Karen Young / Vicki Sue Loehrs7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSandy Hightower / Bobbie Carpenter vs Haven Willis / Laura Vidal6-7, 4-6
2025-08-14vs Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Leonard / Sandra Leos vs Stephanie Patterson / Arden Row4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAndrea Walker / Shannon Faulkner vs Rachel Hall / Aja Howerton2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSandy Hightower / Bobbie Carpenter vs Jennifer Breedlove / Vanessa Negley6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-28vs Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5WLost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Spreiter / Eden Evans vs Elizabeth Elmburg / Elaine Lehman4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesShannon Faulkner / Andrea Walker vs Michelle Evans / Lindy Collins3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesBobbie Carpenter / Michelle Carabello vs Whitney Bingham / Bailey Bird6-3, 6-2
2025-07-17vs Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie Spreiter / Sandra Leos vs Tonia Parsons / Dona Zanotti0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Walker / Shannon Faulkner vs Shannon Pearson / Vicki Sue Loehrs6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Washatka / Bobbie Carpenter vs Corinne Johnson / Laura Vidal0-6, 1-6
2025-07-09vs Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Leonard / Natalie Spreiter vs Stefanie Lee / Julianna Adams1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTracy Earls / Eden Evans vs Rachel Hall / Kristen Schooley0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Washatka / Sandy Hightower vs Jennifer Hamilton / Vanessa Negley6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5W601538116
2Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.04210818157
32: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.04211719167
4Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.04210819149
5Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0339922168
6Celestain/LF 3.0-4.0339922170
7Hayes/IS 3.0-4.02481022168
8Schluter/LF 3.0-4.02471127196
9Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.01561227201
10Evans/GR 3.0-4.01551328186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Michelle Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
3.53
Tuesday Evers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.34
Sandra Leos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Natalie Spreiter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Eden Evans
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Michelle Carabello
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Sandy Hightower
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.89
Shannon Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Tracy Earls
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.75
Bobbie Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Sarah Washatka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.57
Andrea Walker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Carabello + Sandy Hightower6162% games+11.2% vs expected
Bobbie Carpenter + Sandy Hightower9258% games+10.5% vs expected
Shannon Faulkner + Andrea Walker91051% games+3.3% vs expected
Tracy Earls + Eden Evans4549% games+3.1% vs expected
Michelle Carabello + Tracy Earls8458% games+1.3% vs expected
Michelle Leonard + Natalie Spreiter3350% games+0.8% vs expected
Shannon Faulkner + Tracy Earls3547% games−1.0% vs expected
Bobbie Carpenter + Sarah Washatka4354% games−11.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Leonard
117W–96L career · 7 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Tuesday Evers
111W–52L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Sandra Leos
82W–54L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.34
Natalie Spreiter
53W–115L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Eden Evans
109W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Michelle Carabello
31W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.91
Sandy Hightower
143W–115L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Shannon Faulkner
60W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Tracy Earls
170W–131L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.76
3
Bobbie Carpenter
80W–95L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Sarah Washatka
38W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Andrea Walker
37W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.