Teams

Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.0

2025 TUL TRI-LEVEL NIGHT 18 & Over League · WOMEN 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-18vs 2: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Williford / MONICA MCCAFFERTY vs Sthephanie Mab / Alex Campbell6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesStacy Teague / Trisha Millington vs Megan Biram / Serena Henderson3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Bunting / Lana Gooch vs Kelly Hunt / Maddie Biram6-7, 5-7
2025-08-14vs Schluter/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAndrea Williford / MONICA MCCAFFERTY vs Renee Haack / Alyssa Andrew6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMarissa Devinney / Trisha Millington vs Amy Slade / Carol Wilson6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJill Croka / Lana Gooch vs Emily Hale / Kristin Seifried6-0, 7-6
2025-08-04vs Hayes/IS 3.0-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Williford / MONICA MCCAFFERTY vs SONIA TURNEY / Nicole Yoak6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hendrickson / Trisha Millington vs Kerri Leek / Eleanor Doyle6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJulie Bunting / Angela Corley vs Suzanne Rackleff / Madison Hayes4-6, 6-7
2025-07-29vs Celestain/LF 3.0-4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesTrisha Millington / MONICA MCCAFFERTY vs Savanna Rogers / Monica Mitchell3-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Bunting / Lana Gooch vs Casandra Celestain / Jenine Hembree6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJill Croka / Jessica Ullrich vs Krista Sessions / Erin Rich6-4, 6-2
2025-07-17vs 2: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesMONICA MCCAFFERTY / Andrea Williford vs Sthephanie Mab / Mandy Pittman6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Hendrickson / Trisha Millington vs Megan Biram / Serena Henderson6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJill Croka / Jessica Ullrich vs Allison Creel / Kelly Hunt5-7, 4-6
2025-07-09vs Schluter/LF 3.0-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Williford / MONICA MCCAFFERTY vs Lisa Smallwood / Kelli Petersen6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesStacy Teague / Michelle Hendrickson vs Casey Chonka / Jennifer Nicole McCants6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesAngela Corley / Lana Gooch vs Hayli Leavitt / Amy Bradt6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5W601538116
2Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.04210818157
32: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.04211719167
4Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.04210819149
5Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0339922168
6Celestain/LF 3.0-4.0339922170
7Hayes/IS 3.0-4.02481022168
8Schluter/LF 3.0-4.02471127196
9Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.01561227201
10Evans/GR 3.0-4.01551328186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
MONICA MCCAFFERTY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Andrea Williford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.12
Trisha Millington
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.02
Angela Corley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Julie Bunting
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.98
Michelle Hendrickson
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.97
Jessica Ullrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Stacy Teague
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Marissa Devinney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.76
Lana Gooch
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.66
Jill Croka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jill Croka + Lana Gooch14269% games+20.0% vs expected
Michelle Hendrickson + Trisha Millington9461% games+15.9% vs expected
Michelle Hendrickson + Stacy Teague14461% games+14.2% vs expected
Stacy Teague + Trisha Millington4354% games+10.9% vs expected
MONICA MCCAFFERTY + Andrea Williford4164% games+6.5% vs expected
Michelle Hendrickson + Marissa Devinney7554% games+6.4% vs expected
Marissa Devinney + Trisha Millington4454% games+3.8% vs expected
Jill Croka + Jessica Ullrich8556% games+2.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MONICA MCCAFFERTY
59W–23L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.55
4
Andrea Williford
100W–53L career · 5 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Trisha Millington
88W–35L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
3.5
Angela Corley
50W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Julie Bunting
57W–19L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.98
Michelle Hendrickson
64W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.98
Jessica Ullrich
118W–55L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.97
Stacy Teague
94W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Marissa Devinney
56W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Lana Gooch
64W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Jill Croka
56W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%87%1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.