Teams

Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.0

2025 TUL TRI-LEVEL NIGHT 18 & Over League · WOMEN 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.67 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-09-07vs Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.0Split 11
W#1 DoublesJoanie Bonfield Dinneen / Betsy Bryce vs Heather Duncan / Antonia Parchuri6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKaren Young / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Haley Schroedter / Devon Chatley4-6, 3-6
2025-08-18vs Evans/GR 3.0-4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesDona Zanotti / Betsy Bryce vs Sandra Leos / Natalie Spreiter6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Young / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Tracy Earls / Eden Evans7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHaven Willis / Laura Vidal vs Sandy Hightower / Bobbie Carpenter7-6, 6-4
2025-08-04vs Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Oquin / Tonia Parsons vs Stefanie Lee / Rachel DeWitt6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Young / Bobbi Jo Gibson vs Rachel Hall / Cindy Crowder5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Vidal / Corinne Johnson vs Jennifer Hamilton / Sarah Munger6-4, 7-5
2025-07-28vs Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesDona Zanotti / Joanie Bonfield Dinneen vs Lori Buechler / Antonia Parchuri6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBobbi Jo Gibson / Shannon Pearson vs Devon Chatley / Paula Marshall6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Laura Vidal vs Rebecca Heatherman / Elaina Osteen6-4, 6-3
2025-07-23vs Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5WLost 03
L#1 DoublesBetsy Bryce / Joanie Bonfield Dinneen vs Madeline Cameron / Lindsay Perkins1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesBobbi Jo Gibson / Shannon Pearson vs Hunter Sidorakis / Morgan Murry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Vidal / Haven Willis vs Felicity Jones / Adrienne Kleckner1-6, 4-6
2025-07-17vs Evans/GR 3.0-4.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesTonia Parsons / Dona Zanotti vs Natalie Spreiter / Sandra Leos6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesShannon Pearson / Vicki Sue Loehrs vs Andrea Walker / Shannon Faulkner7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCorinne Johnson / Laura Vidal vs Sarah Washatka / Bobbie Carpenter6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5W601538116
2Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.04210818157
32: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.04211719167
4Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.04210819149
5Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0339922168
6Celestain/LF 3.0-4.0339922170
7Hayes/IS 3.0-4.02481022168
8Schluter/LF 3.0-4.02471127196
9Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.01561227201
10Evans/GR 3.0-4.01551328186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Tonia Parsons
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Dona Zanotti
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Betsy Bryce
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.22
Shannon Pearson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Michelle Oquin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Bobbi Jo Gibson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Corinne Johnson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.85
Haven Willis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Laura Vidal
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.59
Vicki Sue Loehrs
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Young
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanie Bonfield Dinneen + Haven Willis6264% games+14.5% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Vicki Sue Loehrs5162% games+13.6% vs expected
Dona Zanotti + Tonia Parsons10170% games+12.2% vs expected
Michelle Oquin + Tonia Parsons11455% games+10.4% vs expected
Vicki Sue Loehrs + Haven Willis7365% games+10.4% vs expected
Corinne Johnson + Laura Vidal12563% games+9.0% vs expected
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen + Dona Zanotti221056% games+8.6% vs expected
Haven Willis + Laura Vidal7164% games+7.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tonia Parsons
117W–71L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
Dona Zanotti
156W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.52
4
Betsy Bryce
142W–101L career · 3 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
3.25
Shannon Pearson
53W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
Michelle Oquin
61W–57L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.14
3.5
Bobbi Jo Gibson
116W–90L career · 3 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Corinne Johnson
135W–90L career · 6 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Haven Willis
205W–107L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%1%99%
2.85
Laura Vidal
114W–58L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
Vicki Sue Loehrs
94W–72L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%27%73%
2.59
Joanie Bonfield Dinneen
95W–70L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen Young
24W–18L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.