Teams

Hayes/IS 3.0-4.0

2025 TUL TRI-LEVEL NIGHT 18 & Over League · WOMEN 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / OKLAHOMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-08-04vs Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesSONIA TURNEY / Nicole Yoak vs Andrea Williford / MONICA MCCAFFERTY6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKerri Leek / Eleanor Doyle vs Michelle Hendrickson / Trisha Millington3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Rackleff / Madison Hayes vs Julie Bunting / Angela Corley6-4, 7-6
2025-07-23vs Schluter/LF 3.0-4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesStacy Upton / Nicole Yoak vs Lisa Smallwood / Carol Wilson7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAndrea Hayes / Kerri Leek vs Casey Chonka / Jennifer Nicole McCants6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMadison Hayes / Barb Evans vs Hayli Leavitt / Lauren Gellman6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · WOMEN 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Blue 1: Watling/SH 3.0-3.5W601538116
2Blue 2: Willis/LF 3.0-4.04210818157
32: Hunt/LF 3.0-4.04211719167
4Tulsa: Devinney/GR 3.0-4.04210819149
5Crowder/LF 3.0-4.0339922168
6Celestain/LF 3.0-4.0339922170
7Hayes/IS 3.0-4.02481022168
8Schluter/LF 3.0-4.02471127196
9Schroedter/TTC 3.0-4.01561227201
10Evans/GR 3.0-4.01551328186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Nicole Yoak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Kathy Blackim
published
3.31
Stacy Upton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Andrea Hayes
published 3.5
3.15
Kerri Leek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.11
Madison Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
3.08
SONIA TURNEY
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Andrea Winters
published 3.5
2.94
Suzanne Rackleff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
Barb Evans
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Eleanor Doyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michelle Hackett
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacy Upton + Kerri Leek8362% games+18.0% vs expected
Kathy Blackim + Stacy Upton8455% games+10.8% vs expected
Barb Evans + Andrea Winters4166% games+3.9% vs expected
Kathy Blackim + SONIA TURNEY132546% games+1.0% vs expected
Barb Evans + Suzanne Rackleff8164% games−0.7% vs expected
Michelle Hackett + Suzanne Rackleff4453% games−1.4% vs expected
Kathy Blackim + Barb Evans4156% gamesnot enough data
Eleanor Doyle + Barb Evans123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nicole Yoak
13W–25L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
3.35
Kathy Blackim
137W–137L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.35
Stacy Upton
98W–48L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Andrea Hayes
23W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kerri Leek
111W–58L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
Madison Hayes
57W–10L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.11
SONIA TURNEY
52W–77L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.08
3.5
Andrea Winters
47W–23L career · no lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Suzanne Rackleff
60W–23L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Barb Evans
145W–117L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Eleanor Doyle
98W–46L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.86
Michelle Hackett
24W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.