Teams

Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle000000
2Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer000000
3Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown000000
4Indy C 7.5W CRC Gates000000
5Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg000000
6Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen000000
7Indy C 7.5W IRCD Pruitt000000
8Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane000000
9Indy C 7.5W IUTC Coghlan000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Angela Marshall
published 4
3.56
Amy Deckard
published 4
3.56
Theresa Bayt
published
3.51
Jessica Wilkerson
published
3.47
Lucy Lane
published
3.42
Katie Filler
published
3.30
Melissa Stein
published
3.26
Allison Gritton
published 3.5
3.24
Vickie Melcher
published
3.21
Jennifer Forsee
published
3.07
Erin Young
published 3.5
3.01
Paula Deemer
published
Louise Marsh
published
Nancy Gunderson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paula Deemer + Vickie Melcher241354% games+1.0% vs expected
Jennifer Forsee + Lucy Lane4847% games−3.0% vs expected
Paula Deemer + Lucy Lane11850% games−4.4% vs expected
Theresa Bayt + Lucy Lane3541% games−6.2% vs expected
Angela Marshall + Lucy Lane4348% games−6.6% vs expected
Angela Marshall + Theresa Bayt4845% games−6.8% vs expected
Erin Young + Lucy Lane1936% games−8.3% vs expected
Erin Young + Jennifer Forsee1930% games−12.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angela Marshall
50W–59L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Amy Deckard
140W–139L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Theresa Bayt
165W–133L career · no lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jessica Wilkerson
147W–54L career · no lines in 2026
47%53%<1%
3.51
Lucy Lane
47W–74L career · no lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
Katie Filler
173W–91L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Melissa Stein
17W–36L career · no lines in 2026
94%6%<1%
3.30
3.5
Allison Gritton
14W–34L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Vickie Melcher
89W–79L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Forsee
21W–89L career · no lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
3.21
3.5
Erin Young
15W–52L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.07
Paula Deemer
63W–88L career · no lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
3.01
Louise Marsh
80W–67L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Nancy Gunderson
30W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.