Teams

Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle000000
2Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer000000
3Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown000000
4Indy C 7.5W CRC Gates000000
5Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg000000
6Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen000000
7Indy C 7.5W IRCD Pruitt000000
8Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane000000
9Indy C 7.5W IUTC Coghlan000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.67
Martha Harker
published
3.59
Julie Elliott
published
3.51
Diane Turpen
published 4
3.48
Catherine McCann
published 4
3.45
Janette Martin
published
3.43
Carla Crouse
published 3.5
3.33
Charlene Keller
published 3.5
3.29
Masumi Makio
published
3.27
Jill Tallman
published
3.21
Laura Combs
published
3.16
Maria Hittle
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Hittle + Charlene Keller6253% games+7.7% vs expected
Carla Crouse + Laura Combs8164% games+7.3% vs expected
Jill Tallman + Laura Combs10455% games+4.5% vs expected
Carla Crouse + Jill Tallman9364% games+4.5% vs expected
Catherine McCann + Janette Martin4649% games+2.6% vs expected
Maria Hittle + Jill Tallman3544% games−6.3% vs expected
Julie Elliott + Charlene Keller224 matchesnot enough data
Maria Hittle + Laura Combs224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Harker
181W–98L career · no lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.67
Julie Elliott
73W–76L career · no lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
4
Diane Turpen
40W–30L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
3.51
4
Catherine McCann
123W–95L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.48
Janette Martin
85W–149L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.45
3.5
Carla Crouse
116W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Charlene Keller
54W–48L career · no lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Masumi Makio
126W–84L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.29
Jill Tallman
82W–49L career · no lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Laura Combs
164W–74L career · no lines in 2026
<1%7%93%
3.21
Maria Hittle
72W–96L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.