Teams

Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg

Fall USTA Central Indiana Combo Adult · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F

16 players · average NTRP 3.80 / CENTRAL INDIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings9 teams · CIN Indianapolis Combo 7.5 Women, F
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Indy C 7.5W IRCD Hittle000000
2Indy C 7.5W CRC Meyer000000
3Indy C 7.5W IRCD Brown000000
4Indy C 7.5W CRC Gates000000
5Indy C 7.5W IRCD Faulkenberg000000
6Indy C 7.5W PATC Olsen000000
7Indy C 7.5W IRCD Pruitt000000
8Indy C 7.5W JCC Lane000000
9Indy C 7.5W IUTC Coghlan000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Hema Wetzel
published 4.5
4.00
Maria Thompson
published
3.94
Belinda Denning
published 4
3.93
Melissa Hehmann
published
3.75
Mae Joubert
published
3.70
Charlene Tay
published 4
3.59
Leah Gehring
published
3.58
Sheri Faulkenberg
published
3.51
Taeko Escasa
published
3.49
Linda Burwell
published
3.45
Ann Osuntokun
published 3.5
3.43
Kathleen Golightly
published
3.40
Mariko Tsuyuki
published
3.38
Kate Li
published
3.21
Tamara Kafka
published
Andrea Hoffman
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Thompson + Mae Joubert7659% games+10.3% vs expected
Sheri Faulkenberg + Belinda Denning4354% games+9.8% vs expected
Sheri Faulkenberg + Leah Gehring191353% games+7.0% vs expected
Kathleen Golightly + Maria Thompson5162% games−0.2% vs expected
Kathleen Golightly + Linda Burwell914958% games−0.6% vs expected
Maria Thompson + Linda Burwell3252% gamesnot enough data
Taeko Escasa + Mariko Tsuyuki4159% gamesnot enough data
Leah Gehring + Belinda Denning3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Hema Wetzel
21W–13L career · no lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
4.03
Maria Thompson
147W–130L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
4
Belinda Denning
155W–70L career · no lines in 2026
<1%67%33%
3.94
Melissa Hehmann
146W–46L career · no lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
Mae Joubert
93W–43L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Charlene Tay
135W–50L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Leah Gehring
65W–54L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.59
Sheri Faulkenberg
105W–94L career · no lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.58
Taeko Escasa
260W–113L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Linda Burwell
178W–93L career · no lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Ann Osuntokun
144W–138L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.45
Kathleen Golightly
157W–119L career · no lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.43
Mariko Tsuyuki
76W–50L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
Kate Li
91W–44L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Tamara Kafka
70W–40L career · no lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
3
Andrea Hoffman
30W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.