Teams

Shenanigans

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

14 players · average NTRP 3.12 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-06-29vs Sugar and SliceLost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Erin Retelle vs Katelyn Carlock / Rebecca Franson3-6, 1-6
2023-06-27vs Each HitLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Emery Baker vs Mardianne Howell / Colleen Schoeck7-5, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Rusk / Suzanne Hickok vs Zel Mertz / Terri Wippel0-6, 0-6
2023-06-22Split 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Emery Baker vs Rachel Boren / Karie Pappani6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesJennifer Rusk vs Susan Keller2-6, 2-6
2023-06-20vs Point BreakersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Emery Baker vs Lisa Gardner / Cynthia Copple4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Hickok / Jennifer Rusk vs Tannan Koehl / Emily Allen5-7, 3-6
2023-06-13vs Honey DeuceLost 01
L#2 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Jennifer Rusk vs Jacqueline Hickman / Dana Rusin0-6, 0-6
2023-06-01vs Nothing but LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesWendy Lahmon / Emery Baker vs Rebecca Clift-French / Christina Floyd4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJennifer Rusk vs Treva Pline3-6, 3-6
2023-05-30vs Play It ForwardSplit 11
L#2 DoublesChristine Cannon / Wendy Lahmon vs Vicki Goss / JoLyn Janecko4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hickok / Jennifer Rusk vs Shaylee Healy / Kari Forney6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Emery Baker
published 3.5
3.06
Gracie Franks
published 3.5
3.03
KATIE RATLIFF
published 3
2.71
Heidi Friend
published 3
2.70
Suzanne Hickok
published 3
2.70
Christine Cannon
published 3
2.69
Kathy Deahl
published 3
2.63
Erin Retelle
published 3
Fanny Melnikovsky
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Jennifer Rusk
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 14% · published
Karen Sheehan
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Patricia Hoffman
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Robin Toney
usually #1 Doubles 73%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Wendy Lahmon
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heidi Friend + Suzanne Hickok1538% games+0.8% vs expected
Suzanne Hickok + Erin Retelle111948% games−1.3% vs expected
Kathy Deahl + Christine Cannon81643% games−6.4% vs expected
Robin Toney + Gracie Franks485050% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Friend + Karen Sheehan203642% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Jennifer Rusk101846% gamesnot enough data
Christine Cannon + Patricia Hoffman8848% gamesnot enough data
Kathy Deahl + Jennifer Rusk01230% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Emery Baker
32W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
3.63
3.5
Gracie Franks
74W–90L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
3
KATIE RATLIFF
127W–121L career · no lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Heidi Friend
101W–130L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Suzanne Hickok
75W–124L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
3
Christine Cannon
82W–136L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70
3
Kathy Deahl
29W–61L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Erin Retelle
64W–112L career · no lines in 2023
17%82%<1%
2.63
Fanny Melnikovsky
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Rusk
44W–62L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Sheehan
34W–43L career · 9 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Hoffman
50W–57L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Robin Toney
38W–48L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
Wendy Lahmon
7W–12L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.