Teams

Point Breakers

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

22 players · average NTRP 3.68 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-06-20vs ShenanigansWon 10
W#2 DoublesStacey Strong / Nancy Raeber vs Kathy Deahl / Robin Toney6-3, 6-2
2023-06-13vs Aloha Beaches 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKara Taggart / Cynthia Copple vs Ladawan Johnson / Amy Wendel2-6, 1-6
2023-06-08Won 10
W#2 DoublesEmily Allen / Nancy Raeber vs Suzie Wilson / Andrea Lambe6-2, 7-5
2023-06-06vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#3 DoublesLisa Gardner / Kara Taggart vs Lori Sato / Kim Buchanan5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2023-05-23Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKara Taggart / Andrea Reynolds vs Nancy Mallory / Marnie Newton5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Maji Daines
published 4.5
3.67
Alexandra Hodson
published 4
3.63
Angie Magnuson
published 4
3.54
3.43
Molly Schafer
published 3.5
3.42
Stacey Strong
published 3.5
3.39
Molly Otter
published 3.5
3.30
Tannan Koehl
published
3.26
Glory Questad
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3.5
3.26
Stephanie Churchman
published 3.5
3.25
Betsy McDonald
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Elba Massena
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.23
Andrea Reynolds
published 3.5
3.21
Cynthia Copple
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.06
Emily Allen
published 3.5
3.05
Jennifer Wilson
published
Julie McDonald
published
Kara Taggart
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lauren Noonan
usually #3 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Melissa Nielsen
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Nancy Raeber
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Allen + Angie Magnuson5461% games+11.7% vs expected
Jennifer Wilson + Stephanie Churchman5356% games+11.2% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Emily Allen121253% games+8.5% vs expected
Alexandra Hodson + Maji Daines25661% games+6.8% vs expected
Glory Questad + Angie Magnuson161650% games+5.5% vs expected
Stacey Strong + Emily Allen292854% games+2.9% vs expected
Cynthia Copple + Jennifer Wilson3444% games−0.7% vs expected
Betsy McDonald + Sondra Power-Thornton12459% games−2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Maji Daines
163W–74L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Alexandra Hodson
155W–90L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Angie Magnuson
113W–90L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Sondra Power-Thornton
108W–90L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.54
3.5
Molly Schafer
87W–80L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Stacey Strong
64W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Molly Otter
136W–82L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.39
Tannan Koehl
92W–61L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Glory Questad
97W–116L career · 13 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Stephanie Churchman
136W–92L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy McDonald
75W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Elba Massena
23W–24L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Andrea Reynolds
84W–122L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Cynthia Copple
74W–96L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Jennifer Johnson
58W–96L career · 7 lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Emily Allen
82W–69L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Jennifer Wilson
85W–66L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Julie McDonald
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kara Taggart
32W–46L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Noonan
64W–53L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melissa Nielsen
47W–27L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Raeber
46W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.