Teams

Each Hit

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

17 players · average NTRP 3.61 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-06-27Won 10
W#1 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs KATIE RATLIFF6-1, 6-2
2023-06-22Won 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Hobbs vs Barbara Beagles6-0, 6-0
2023-06-20vs Aloha Beaches 3.5Won 10
W#2 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Lori Muench6-2, 6-0
2023-06-15vs Summer ShotsWon 10
W#1 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Eileen Ursillo6-2, 6-1
2023-06-13vs Nothing but LoveWon 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Hobbs vs Treva Pline6-0, 6-0
2023-06-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Kimberly Shansby6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-06-06vs Sugar and SliceWon 10
W#1 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Julia Garofalo6-1, 6-1
2023-06-01vs YOURS!Won 10
W#1 SinglesCourtney Hobbs vs Nelda Denton6-3, 6-1
2023-05-23Won 20
W#1 SinglesCourtney Hobbs vs Molly Schafer6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDaniela Hefner vs Alexandra Hodson7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for TV have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Courtney Hobbs
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.73
Daniela Hefner
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.61
Colleen Schoeck
published 4
3.54
Adair Holden
published 3.5
3.51
Anna Orrison
published 3.5
3.42
Michele Inghram
published 3.5
3.38
Zel Mertz
published 3.5
3.38
Mardianne Howell
published 3.5
3.35
Kimberlee Megale
published 3.5
3.34
Katherine Bleth
published 3.5
3.31
Nancy Mallory
published 3.5
3.25
Terri Wippel
published 3.5
3.24
Marnie Newton
published 3.5
3.09
Teresa McDonald
published 3.5
Katie Laws
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
Melanie Mitchell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Rebecca Swanson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marnie Newton + Zel Mertz5361% games+2.4% vs expected
Kimberlee Megale + Mardianne Howell9461% games+1.6% vs expected
Zel Mertz + Anna Orrison18559% games−0.8% vs expected
Marnie Newton + Michele Inghram11760% games−1.0% vs expected
Marnie Newton + Anna Orrison10755% games−1.7% vs expected
Michele Inghram + Mardianne Howell8261% games−3.1% vs expected
Teresa McDonald + Katherine Bleth4648% games−3.1% vs expected
Kimberlee Megale + Michele Inghram9654% games−4.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtney Hobbs
57W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
3.92
4
Daniela Hefner
36W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Colleen Schoeck
125W–66L career · no lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Adair Holden
127W–71L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Anna Orrison
241W–148L career · no lines in 2023
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Michele Inghram
147W–119L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Zel Mertz
310W–181L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Mardianne Howell
88W–99L career · no lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.38
3.5
Kimberlee Megale
183W–106L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
3.5
Katherine Bleth
106W–132L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Nancy Mallory
189W–137L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Terri Wippel
147W–129L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Marnie Newton
214W–184L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
3.5
Teresa McDonald
152W–152L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Katie Laws
38W–35L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Melanie Mitchell
44W–61L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Swanson
21W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.