Teams

Summer Shots

2023 USTA ADULT 18 and OVER - BOISE · TV

24 players · average NTRP 3.29 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-06-22Won 10
W#3 DoublesNanette Hull / Jill Mckinney vs Jill Yost / Katherine Bruno6-2, 7-6
2023-06-13vs Net PartyLost 01
L#1 DoublesLiz Crookston / Nanette Hull vs Shawna Byington / Amanda Steele6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-06-06Lost 01
L#2 SinglesNanette Hull vs Fanny Melnikovsky3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-05-23vs Nothing but LoveLost 01
L#3 DoublesNanette Hull / Jacqueline Lawley vs Laura Fletcher / Kathy Hansen2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Aloha Beaches 3.537222860438
2Summer Shots37113984543
3Sugar and Slice19173372508

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 22 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Sophia Haroian
published
3.73
Andrea Lambe
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 29% · published 4
3.60
Chynna Castoro
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 36% · published 3.5
3.36
Jacqueline Lawley
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.35
Lindsey Cassidy
published 3.5
3.32
Allison Rohnert
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.23
Eileen Ursillo
published 3.5
3.13
Farrell Kessler
published 3
3.13
Lora Bonser
published 3.5
3.11
Amy Costello
published 3.5
3.10
Dyan Goulet
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.09
Gillian Donahey
published 3
3.04
Nanette Hull
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.99
Suzie Wilson
published
2.97
Amy Salerno
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.94
Stacey Novak
published 3
2.89
Nikki Reynolds
published 3
2.81
Cindy Haroian
published 3
2.78
Cathy Drake
published 3
2.74
Christa Napier
published 3
2.73
Sheila Hennessey
published 3
2.66
Emily Beckmann
published 3
Jill Mckinney
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Singles 14% · published
Liz Crookston
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Farrell Kessler + Lindsey Cassidy9165% games+6.9% vs expected
Lora Bonser + Amy Costello5157% games+1.7% vs expected
Nikki Reynolds + Farrell Kessler4546% games+1.5% vs expected
Stacey Novak + Lora Bonser4749% games+0.3% vs expected
Suzie Wilson + Amy Salerno41242% games−1.0% vs expected
Suzie Wilson + Cindy Haroian4942% games−1.9% vs expected
Christa Napier + Nikki Reynolds12953% games−2.9% vs expected
Suzie Wilson + Allison Rohnert6848% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Haroian
26W–12L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
4.05
4
Andrea Lambe
43W–38L career · 7 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.73
3.5
Chynna Castoro
63W–18L career · 11 lines in 2023
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Jacqueline Lawley
69W–49L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Lindsey Cassidy
111W–79L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
3.5
Allison Rohnert
45W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
3.5
Eileen Ursillo
133W–146L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
3
Farrell Kessler
106W–81L career · no lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.13
3.5
Lora Bonser
117W–110L career · no lines in 2023
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Amy Costello
148W–95L career · type A · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
3.5
Dyan Goulet
60W–69L career · 14 lines in 2023
22%78%<1%
3.10
3
Gillian Donahey
94W–116L career · no lines in 2023
<1%24%76%
3.09
Nanette Hull
34W–72L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.04
Suzie Wilson
81W–178L career · no lines in 2023
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Amy Salerno
39W–42L career · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
3
Stacey Novak
88W–110L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Nikki Reynolds
74W–67L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Cindy Haroian
76W–100L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Cathy Drake
57W–56L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Christa Napier
81W–65L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
2.74
3
Sheila Hennessey
28W–40L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Emily Beckmann
62W–53L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%<1%
2.66
Jill Mckinney
67W–47L career · 7 lines in 2023
not enough data
Liz Crookston
26W–59L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.