Teams

ALPINE HILLS 40AW2.5+A-DT

2026 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 2.5+

28 players · average NTRP 2.86 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-03-13vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesDale Lachtman / Samantha Bufton vs Joanna Meiseles / Trish Collins3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesTeresa Byrne vs Sarina Beges6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLucia Rotelli / Kristin Brew vs Kristina Hehrne / Stephanie Frick5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTeresa Byrne / Lauren Bochnowski vs Aya Takeuchi / Regina Eberhart6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJaneen Poutre vs Amber Zhao6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Matsumoto / Lucia Rotelli vs Tami Adachi / Devora Kothari6-1, 6-0
2026-03-03vs FOOTHILLS TandS 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 02
L#1 DoublesElise Gabrielson / Jami Worthington vs Ree Noh / Stacey Wu-Savard4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Harding / Kristin Brew vs Christine Bruckner / Dandan Xue3-6, 1-6
2026-02-27vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesSamantha Bufton / Sylvia Thompson vs Shannon Beck / Joanna Meiseles4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHayley Bakken vs Jennifer Corey6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPatricia Law / Wendi Karam vs Raluca Perkins / Marlena Lyon4-6, 0-6
2026-02-26vs CUESTA TC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesHayley Bakken / Megan Ward vs Isabel Stroecker / Paola Mazzocchi6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesCatherine Gillis vs Christine Niebuhr6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatricia Law / Sara Spangelo vs Dimitra Papachristou / Linda Daniel2-6, 1-6
2026-02-06vs LADERA OAKS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlisha Senescu / Jami Worthington vs Armita Abadian / Karen Tallackson Bacon6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJulie Harding / Maria Matsumoto vs Grace Yunus / Paula Klemens6-1, 6-3
2026-02-04vs FREMONT HILLS CC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAimee Armsby / Sylvia Thompson vs Jillian Draeger / Keryun Dukellis1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesTeresa Byrne vs Elaine Chong1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bors / Wendi Karam vs Gilda Foss / Betsy Schmitt6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-21vs LADERA OAKS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmily Lopez / Dale Lachtman vs Erika Evans / Whitney Tabaie6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJaneen Poutre vs Paula Klemens6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSara Spangelo / Patricia Bors vs Grace Yunus / Gina Stathacopoulos6-2, 6-2
2026-01-21vs LADERA OAKS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesDale Lachtman / Emily Lopez vs Erika Evans / Whitney Tabaie6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJaneen Poutre vs Paula Klemens6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesPatricia Bors / Sara Spangelo vs Grace Yunus / Gina Stathacopoulos6-2, 6-2
2026-01-14vs FOOTHILLS TandS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesAimee Armsby / Lauren Bochnowski vs Leslie Behar / Ree Noh7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRenata Dionello vs Simona Bandong4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesChelsea Matter / Maria Matsumoto vs Wendy Herby / Alane Kataria6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesCatherine Gillis / Janeen Poutre vs Aya Takeuchi / Emily Boyer6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEmily Lopez vs Elaine Chen4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesPatricia Law / Sara Spangelo vs Tami Adachi / Joy Ma6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · Women's 2.5+
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 25 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Hayley Bakken
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Catherine Gillis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.97
Lauren Bochnowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Amy An
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.85
Aimee Armsby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Dale Lachtman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.79
Alisha Senescu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Maria Matsumoto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.69
Renata Dionello
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.68
Sylvia Thompson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.65
Janeen Poutre
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Samantha Bufton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.64
Melissa Land
published
2.58
Julie Harding
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Sara Spangelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Patricia Bors
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Emily Lopez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.49
Elise Gabrielson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Kristin Brew
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Patricia Law
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Jami Worthington
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.34
Teresa Byrne
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Chelsea Matter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Wendi Karam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Denby Sellers
published 2.5
2.18
Sallie DeGolia
published
Lucia Rotelli
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Berg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aimee Armsby + Samantha Bufton3257% gamesnot enough data
Emily Lopez + Dale Lachtman314 matchesnot enough data
Denby Sellers + Maria Matsumoto404 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Law + Sara Spangelo213 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Gillis + Hayley Bakken213 matchesnot enough data
Julie Harding + Maria Matsumoto213 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Bors + Maria Matsumoto303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayley Bakken
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
3.01
3
Catherine Gillis
10W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.97
Lauren Bochnowski
10W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.97
3
Amy An
10W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Aimee Armsby
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
2.85
3
Dale Lachtman
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
Alisha Senescu
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
2.79
Maria Matsumoto
18W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.75
Renata Dionello
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%9%91%
2.69
Sylvia Thompson
16W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Janeen Poutre
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.65
Samantha Bufton
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%15%85%
2.64
Melissa Land
2W–3L career · no lines in 2026
16%84%1%
2.64
Julie Harding
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%30%70%
2.58
Sara Spangelo
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%34%66%
2.56
Patricia Bors
11W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.52
Emily Lopez
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Elise Gabrielson
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%52%48%
2.49
Kristin Brew
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%69%31%
2.43
Patricia Law
10W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Jami Worthington
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Teresa Byrne
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.34
2.5
Chelsea Matter
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Wendi Karam
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.25
2.5
Denby Sellers
7W–2L career · no lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Sallie DeGolia
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.18
Lucia Rotelli
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rachel Berg
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.