Teams

CUESTA TC 40AW2.5+A-DT

2026 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 2.5+

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-06vs FOOTHILLS TandS 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Dimitra Papachristou vs Simona Bandong / Carole Borie1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Sabrina Dong6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Daniel / Demetra Metaxas vs Dandan Xue / Alane Kataria2-6, 3-6
2026-03-04vs FREMONT HILLS CC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesShilpi Bhargava / Isabel Stroecker vs Keryun Dukellis / Wendy McDowell0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Elaine Chong6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Daniel / Dimitra Papachristou vs Gilda Foss / Betsy Schmitt7-5, 7-5
2026-02-26vs ALPINE HILLS 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Paola Mazzocchi vs Hayley Bakken / Megan Ward3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesChristine Niebuhr vs Catherine Gillis2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDimitra Papachristou / Linda Daniel vs Patricia Law / Sara Spangelo6-2, 6-1
2026-02-24vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Niebuhr / Shilpi Bhargava vs Laura Radosh Butt / Jennifer Corey6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Raluca Perkins6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Ip / Elena Mitschkowetz vs Marlena Lyon / Missy Reller6-4, 7-6
2026-02-04vs LADERA OAKS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Paola Mazzocchi vs Lisa Mccaffrey / Brooke Budelli6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDimitra Papachristou vs Camelia Coupal6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Ip / Elena Mitschkowetz vs Paula Klemens / Annette Fountain6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Shilpi Bhargava vs Regina Eberhart / Elaine Chen6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Emily Boyer6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDemetra Metaxas / Laura Ip vs Brenda Razee / Devora Kothari7-5, 6-0
2026-01-28vs FOOTHILLS TandS 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Stella Blanck vs Stacey Wu-Savard / Michelle Leung2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Simona Bandong6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDimitra Papachristou / Linda Daniel vs Christine Bruckner / Mallary Alcheck3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesIsabel Stroecker / Stella Blanck vs Elaine Chen / Amy Gregg6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShilpi Bhargava vs Amber Zhao3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDemetra Metaxas / Laura Ip vs Tami Adachi / Brenda Razee6-1, 6-0
2026-01-16vs UNIVERSITY CLUB PA 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesStella Blanck / Christine Niebuhr vs Joanna Meiseles / Laura Radosh Butt6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIsabel Stroecker vs Shannon Beck6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Daniel / Laura Ip vs Stephanie Frick / Kristina Hehrne4-6, 5-7
2026-01-13vs FREMONT HILLS CC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Niebuhr / Stella Blanck vs Susan Lee / Sara Rao6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDesislava Hartisch vs Elaine Chong6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDimitra Papachristou / Linda Daniel vs Christine Lenz / Betsy Schmitt6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · Women's 2.5+
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Desislava Hartisch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Christine Niebuhr
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.80
Isabel Stroecker
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #1 Singles 13% · published
2.77
Shilpi Bhargava
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.55
Dimitra Papachristou
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 2.5
2.54
Demetra Metaxas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.52
Elena Mitschkowetz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Laura Ip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Linda Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Stella Blanck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paola Mazzocchi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Shilpi Bhargava + Christine Niebuhr6063% games+12.4% vs expected
Linda Daniel + Dimitra Papachristou6160% games+9.6% vs expected
Christine Niebuhr + Laura Ip2343% gamesnot enough data
Dimitra Papachristou + Isabel Stroecker2353% gamesnot enough data
Elena Mitschkowetz + Laura Ip213 matchesnot enough data
Demetra Metaxas + Laura Ip303 matchesnot enough data
Dimitra Papachristou + Paola Mazzocchi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Desislava Hartisch
6W–0L career · type D · 6 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
3
Christine Niebuhr
34W–18L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Isabel Stroecker
24W–16L career · 8 lines in 2026
0%2%98%
2.80
Shilpi Bhargava
14W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
2.5
Dimitra Papachristou
13W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
2.5
Demetra Metaxas
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%40%60%
2.54
Elena Mitschkowetz
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%45%55%
2.52
Laura Ip
10W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%77%23%
2.40
Linda Daniel
8W–8L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Stella Blanck
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Paola Mazzocchi
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.