Teams

SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5+A-DT

2026 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 2.5+

15 players · average NTRP 2.70 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesJennifer Acker / Dena McManis vs Jill Schapiro / Mandana Jamshidnejad6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAllison Weinstein vs Mila Veber7-6, 4-0
W#2 DoublesKate Woodcox / Susie Chao vs Loren Skeen / Priscilla Huaman6-4, 6-2
2026-03-10vs MORAGA CC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeah Branson / Anne Myers vs Mina Penna / Dominique Mickelson3-6, 4-2
W#1 SinglesKate Woodcox vs Elizabeth C Papay6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Yoo / Jennifer Acker vs Jessica Yau / Sara Moore6-1, 6-0
L#1 DoublesHeather Young / Anne Myers vs Jill Schapiro / Mandana Jamshidnejad6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Weinstein / Megan Sullivan vs Gina Zahedi / Maria Angel-Ordonez6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesLeah Branson / Dena McManis vs Mandana Jamshidnejad / Jill Schapiro7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCindy Yang / Megan Sullivan vs Gina Zahedi / Maria Angel-Ordonez1-6, 0-6
2026-02-27vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Disston / Katie Shogan vs Jennifer Bassett / Anne Slater0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSusie Chao / Cindy Yang vs Christina Latta / Vanessa Schuppenhauer4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-27vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Acker / Heather Young vs Cally Stock / Kelsey Tu7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAllison Weinstein vs Jill Gibson3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Walker / Karen Yoo vs Corrine Dugan / Vanessa Schuppenhauer6-3, 6-4
2026-02-12vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Myers / Dena McManis vs Victoria Killmar / Anne Slater6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKaren Yoo vs Christine Nguyen6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesVi Le / Cindy Yang vs Krista Seiden / Vanessa Schuppenhauer2-6, 4-6
2026-02-06vs MORAGA CC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesKate Woodcox / Dena McManis vs Audrey Mao / Dominique Mickelson6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLauren Disston vs Meghan Donnelly3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMegan Sullivan / Susie Chao vs Amy Loos / Maureen Schmidt6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-20vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesHeather Young / Leah Branson vs Erin Brindley / Cally Stock1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKate Woodcox vs Mary Roach0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Weinstein / Megan Sullivan vs Veena Vemuri / Laura Gunn6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2026-01-13vs MORAGA CC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Yoo / Anne Myers vs Jin Sun Park / Mia May1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKatie Shogan vs Sabrina Shippey7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJennifer Walker / Laurie Coyle vs Elizabeth C Papay / Amy Loos6-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · Women's 2.5+
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Robyn Rogin
published
2.90
Daralisa Kelley
published 3
2.54
Allison Weinstein
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.52
Lauren Disston
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Jennifer Acker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Dena McManis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.37
Anne Myers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.35
Susie Chao
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.27
Laurie Coyle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.25
Karen Yoo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.23
Leah Branson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Kate Woodcox
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.15
Katie Shogan
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.75
Cindy Yang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Meghan Schmicker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Disston + Dena McManis303 matchesnot enough data
Dena McManis + Allison Weinstein303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robyn Rogin
6W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Daralisa Kelley
3W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
2.90
2.5
Allison Weinstein
15W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.54
Lauren Disston
9W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%42%58%
2.52
Jennifer Acker
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%60%40%
2.47
2.5
Dena McManis
18W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%75%25%
2.41
3
Anne Myers
0W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
2.37
Susie Chao
5W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.35
Laurie Coyle
3W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
Karen Yoo
4W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.25
Leah Branson
2W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.23
Kate Woodcox
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Katie Shogan
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.15
2.5
Cindy Yang
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.75
Meghan Schmicker
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.