Teams

MORAGA CC 40AW2.5+A-DT

2026 ADULT 40&Over - Daytime · Women's 2.5+

24 players · average NTRP 2.79 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-10vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
W#1 DoublesMina Penna / Dominique Mickelson vs Leah Branson / Anne Myers6-3, 2-4
L#1 SinglesElizabeth C Papay vs Kate Woodcox2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJessica Yau / Sara Moore vs Karen Yoo / Jennifer Acker1-6, 0-6
2026-03-03vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesAimee Kish / Audrey Mao vs Aileen Burgoyne / Christine Nguyen6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSabrina Shippey vs Kristen Steinert7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesLiping Zhang / Elizabeth C Papay vs Veena Vemuri / Krista Seiden2-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesKaren Chiarucci / Vaughan Woodson vs Katy Wrinkle / Jamie Bernstein6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJin Sun Park vs Mila Veber6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJessica Yau / Liping Zhang vs Mandana Jamshidnejad / Jill Schapiro1-6, 1-6
2026-02-20vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
W#1 DoublesSabrina Shippey / Vaughan Woodson vs Joanna Allen / Victoria Killmar6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBeth Chang vs Erica Winnicki6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMegan Appelblom / Marisella Carranza vs Christina Latta / Laura Gunn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesMeghan Donnelly / Vaughan Woodson vs Jill Schapiro / Mandana Jamshidnejad6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMina Penna vs Mila Veber2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Pickering / Maureen Schmidt vs Maria Angel-Ordonez / Gina Zahedi7-6, 6-3
2026-02-06vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 21
L#1 DoublesAudrey Mao / Dominique Mickelson vs Kate Woodcox / Dena McManis1-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeghan Donnelly vs Lauren Disston6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Loos / Maureen Schmidt vs Megan Sullivan / Susie Chao4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-05vs MEADOW STC 40AW2.5+A-DTLost 12
L#1 DoublesBeth Chang / Aimee Kish vs Jennifer Bassett / Erica Winnicki4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJin Sun Park vs Kristen Steinert6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCourtney Pickering / Maureen Schmidt vs Corrine Dugan / Laura Gunn4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBarbara Conlon / Michelle Karver vs Mandana Jamshidnejad / Jill Schapiro3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKaren Chiarucci vs Tanya House4-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBeth Chang / Stephanie Sinclitico vs Mandana Jamshidnejad / Jill Schapiro7-5, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMia May vs Mila Veber5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLiping Zhang / Megan Appelblom vs Priscilla Huaman / Loren Skeen6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-01-13vs SLEEPY HOLLOW 40AW2.5+A-DTWon 30
W#1 DoublesJin Sun Park / Mia May vs Karen Yoo / Anne Myers6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSabrina Shippey vs Katie Shogan5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth C Papay / Amy Loos vs Jennifer Walker / Laurie Coyle7-6, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · Women's 2.5+
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Blaire Stokes
published 3
3.00
Nimisha Chagan
published
2.87
Jin Sun Park
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.85
Karen Chiarucci
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.79
Beth Chang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Dominique Mickelson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Sabrina Shippey
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.63
Aimee Kish
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Courtney Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.51
Meghan Donnelly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.50
Vaughan Woodson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Marisella Carranza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Audrey Mao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Barbara Conlon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.43
Mia May
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.35
Maureen Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Mina Penna
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.32
Stephanie Sinclitico
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Megan Appelblom
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.26
Elizabeth C Papay
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.24
Amy Loos
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.20
Michelle Karver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.11
Liping Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.82
Jessica Yau
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vaughan Woodson + Mia May213 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Schmidt + Courtney Pickering303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Blaire Stokes
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.01
Nimisha Chagan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.00
Jin Sun Park
15W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.87
Karen Chiarucci
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%<1%>99%
2.85
3
Beth Chang
8W–5L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Dominique Mickelson
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sabrina Shippey
12W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%14%86%
2.64
3
Aimee Kish
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
16%84%<1%
2.63
2.5
Courtney Pickering
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%22%78%
2.60
Meghan Donnelly
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%47%53%
2.51
Vaughan Woodson
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
Marisella Carranza
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%51%49%
2.50
Audrey Mao
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%54%46%
2.49
Barbara Conlon
16W–30L career · 1 line in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
Mia May
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%70%30%
2.43
Maureen Schmidt
4W–0L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%88%12%
2.35
Mina Penna
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.33
Stephanie Sinclitico
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
Megan Appelblom
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.32
2.5
Elizabeth C Papay
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26
2.5
Amy Loos
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.24
Michelle Karver
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%99%1%
2.20
Liping Zhang
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jessica Yau
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.