Teams

Team 4 Lord of the Strings

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-03-26Won 10
W#1 SinglesArturo Garcia Alonso vs Matthew Day6-0, 6-2
2023-03-18vs Team 2 Arlington Aces VLost 01
L#1 DoublesJon Felts / Gabriel McHugh vs Richard Gauthier / Brandon Wales6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2023-03-05vs Team 10 NoVA WolvesWon 20
W#1 SinglesArturo Garcia Alonso vs Yao Yao6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGabriel McHugh / Edward Naidich vs Kai Yu / James Zhang6-3, 5-3
2023-02-07vs Team 8 The District AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTarun Hingorani / Edward Naidich vs Jonathan Ramseur / Daniel Laursen1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephen Dupuy / Jeff Stensland vs STEPHEN ROMIG / Mark Goossens6-1, 6-1
2023-02-01vs Team 9 Play It ForwardLost 02
L#1 DoublesDan Wagener / Gabriel McHugh vs James Ruffin / Tim Sawyer3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Dupuy / David Hickey vs Kevin McKeel / Josh Snead4-6, 3-6
2023-01-25vs Team 6 Wise-AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesStephen Dupuy / Jeff Stensland vs Terry Saeger / Perry Zettersten6-4, 6-0
2023-01-22vs Team 7 Racqueteers 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesGabriel McHugh / Edward Naidich vs Carlos Raul Jimenez / Bill Malloy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Arvind Jairam
published 4
3.39
Tarun Hingorani
published
3.32
Arturo Garcia Alonso
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Gabriel McHugh
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Stephen Dupuy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Dan Wagener
published 3.5
3.15
Jeff Stensland
published
3.09
Troy Davig
published
2.93
Edward Naidich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Jim Craig
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edward Naidich + Gabriel McHugh314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Arvind Jairam
116W–62L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.89
Tarun Hingorani
9W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
3.5
Arturo Garcia Alonso
77W–37L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Gabriel McHugh
20W–21L career · 4 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Stephen Dupuy
72W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Dan Wagener
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Jeff Stensland
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
14%85%1%
3.15
Troy Davig
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Edward Naidich
83W–74L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
2.93
Jim Craig
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.