Teams

Team 6 Wise-Aces

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-03-12vs Team 9 Play It ForwardLost 01
L#2 DoublesJason Olson / Joseph Jacangelo vs Mario Olivero-Cabrera / Rohit Munjal5-7, 2-6
2023-03-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEric Hopkins / Joseph Jacangelo vs Andrew Chang / Jing Gu2-6, 2-6
2023-03-04vs Team 8 The District AcesLost 01
L#2 DoublesChristopher Young / Terry Saeger vs Robert Wagoner / Jeffrey Serbu1-6, 3-6
2023-02-20vs Team 3 Officers and A Gentleman.Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBrian Nault / Terry Saeger vs ERIK WITTREICH / Byron Pickard3-6, 3-6
2023-01-25vs Team 4 Lord of the StringsLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerry Saeger / Perry Zettersten vs Stephen Dupuy / Jeff Stensland4-6, 0-6
2023-01-22vs Team 5 Team ChallengersLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Brett Woerner vs Chris Bokel / Brian Partlow3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Brett Woerner
published 3.5
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.02
Brian Barnett
published 3.5
3.00
Terry Saeger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jacob Sultan
published
Jason Olson
published
Nabil Ghadiali
published
Perry Zettersten
published
Scott Sullivant
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brett Woerner
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.36
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
3
Joseph Jacangelo
153W–161L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%41%59%
3.03
3.5
Brian Barnett
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Terry Saeger
77W–96L career · 3 lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
3.00
Jacob Sultan
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jason Olson
31W–30L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nabil Ghadiali
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Perry Zettersten
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Scott Sullivant
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.