Teams

Team 8 The District Aces

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-15vs Team 9 Play It ForwardLost 01
L#1 SinglesAnthony Chang vs Florin Iancu2-6, 3-6
2023-03-04vs Team 6 Wise-AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ramseur / Soumya Dey vs Nabil Ghadiali / Scott Sullivant4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-03-01Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAnthony Chang vs Benjamin Butler3-6, 5-4
2023-02-18vs Team 1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJonathan Ramseur / Robert Wagoner vs Mark Allen / Scott Ogorman5-7, 3-6
2023-02-07vs Team 4 Lord of the StringsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJonathan Ramseur / Daniel Laursen vs Tarun Hingorani / Edward Naidich6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAnthony Chang vs Arvind Jairam2-6, 6-7
2023-02-02vs Team 5 Team ChallengersWon 10
W#1 SinglesAnthony Chang vs Ugbede Abu7-6, 3-3
2023-01-30vs Team 2 Arlington Aces VWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaniel Laursen / Jonathan Ramseur vs Artan Guzja / Richard Gauthier6-1, 6-4
2023-01-16vs Team 3 Officers and A Gentleman.Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSTEPHEN ROMIG / Jonathan Ramseur vs Daniel Hampton / Joe Napolitano2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Daniel Laursen
published 3.5
3.40
Anthony Chang
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Jonathan Ramseur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Robert Wagoner
published
3.08
Jeremy Symons
published
3.00
Soumya Dey
published
2.99
STEPHEN ROMIG
published
Frank Leonard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonathan Ramseur + Daniel Laursen224 matchesnot enough data
Anthony Chang + Jonathan Ramseur303 matchesnot enough data
Jeremy Symons + Robert Wagoner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Daniel Laursen
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Anthony Chang
249W–160L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Jonathan Ramseur
36W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Robert Wagoner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
Jeremy Symons
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.08
Soumya Dey
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.00
STEPHEN ROMIG
0W–10L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
Frank Leonard
27W–24L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.