Teams

Team 2 Arlington Aces V

2023 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

6 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-18vs Team 4 Lord of the StringsWon 10
W#1 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Brandon Wales vs Jon Felts / Gabriel McHugh3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2023-03-04Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Mikhail Velasco vs Stephen Howell / Matthew Kelty3-6, 4-6
2023-02-27vs Team 6 Wise-AcesSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Christopher Swider vs Eric Hopkins / Perry Zettersten6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrandon Wales vs Jacob Sultan3-6, 0-6
2023-02-21vs Team 7 Racqueteers 3.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMikhail Velasco / Richard Gauthier vs Scott Galus / Hassaan Karim6-7, 1-5
2023-02-11vs Team 10 NoVA WolvesWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrandon Wales / Miguel Mendoza vs YANG LIU / James Zhang6-3, 6-3
2023-02-02vs Team 11 CourtmastersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDaniel Hurley / Brandon Wales vs Benjamin Butler / Blake Taylor1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRichard Gauthier / Wesley Stien vs John Wolosuk / Kursat Yavuz6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2023-01-30vs Team 8 The District AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesArtan Guzja / Richard Gauthier vs Daniel Laursen / Jonathan Ramseur1-6, 4-6
2023-01-22vs Team 9 Play It ForwardLost 01
L#1 DoublesPJ Barbour / Brandon Wales vs Stephen Gotts / David Viar2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Brandon Wales
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Christopher Swider
published 3.5
Richard Gauthier
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.71
Miguel Mendoza
published
2.69
Mikhail Velasco
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kiet Ly
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mikhail Velasco + Richard Gauthier033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brandon Wales
65W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%42%58%
3.52
3.5
Christopher Swider
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Richard Gauthier
47W–69L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Miguel Mendoza
12W–6L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
2.71
3
Mikhail Velasco
42W–52L career · 3 lines in 2023
8%91%1%
2.69
Kiet Ly
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.