Teams

Epps/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League-Knoxville · 4.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.62 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-08vs Williams/KnoxvilleLost 02
L#1 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Elena Burns3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesEmily Elison vs Jenna Sweet2-6, 0-6
2024-12-07vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesDonna Walker / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Gabriella Rimmer / Sharon Clark3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Elison vs LOURDES BLANDINO4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Epps / Amanda Martin vs Patsy Fischer / Emily Smead4-6, 1-6
2024-11-23vs Huffman/KnoxvilleWon 31
L#1 DoublesEmily Elison / Kelly Hollingsworth vs Jennifer Bell / Sheri Kilbey2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Maja Lugonjic6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngie Herzog / Deborah Szwarc vs Patsy Fischer / Sharon Clark1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Isabel Cunningham6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-16vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesDonna Walker / Deborah Szwarc vs Lauren Clarke / Kris Gompert1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Morgan Smith0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTracy Collins / Lauren Huston vs Leigh Henderson / Jasmine Dabbs1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Martin / Shelly Ren vs Lisa Perkey / Santana Ewers0-6, 1-6
2024-11-10vs Williams/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 SinglesLisa Gangelhoff vs Lauren Heinrich7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Emily Elison vs Brooke Williams / Nazo Burgy0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesLori DeRoos vs Elena Burns1-6, 6-7
2024-10-26vs Browning/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesAngie Herzog / Deborah Szwarc vs Bethany Hicks / Lauren Clarke2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLauren Huston vs Morgan Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAngie Epps / Amanda Martin vs Jasmine Dabbs / Tara Hurley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Hollingsworth / Donna Walker vs Lisa Perkey / Kris Gompert2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Emily Elison
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.44
Lisa Gangelhoff
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.40
Lauren Huston
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.39
Lori DeRoos
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.31
Angie Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.30
Kelly Hollingsworth
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.24
Deborah Szwarc
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Shelly Ren
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Angie Epps
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Szwarc + Shelly Ren5161% games+10.1% vs expected
Emily Elison + Lauren Huston6558% games+8.8% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Shelly Ren1540% games−0.4% vs expected
Angie Herzog + Deborah Szwarc6941% games−3.4% vs expected
Kelly Hollingsworth + Emily Elison123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Elison
172W–110L career · 8 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.59
Lisa Gangelhoff
8W–29L career · 3 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Lauren Huston
35W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.40
Lori DeRoos
31W–30L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
3.5
Angie Herzog
37W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.31
Kelly Hollingsworth
38W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Deborah Szwarc
50W–45L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
Shelly Ren
17W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Angie Epps
16W–46L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.