Teams

YDeaver-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-05Lost 01
L#1 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Leslie Jackson5-7, 1-6
2025-06-17vs MLong-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesKellianne White vs Laurie Rechholtz4-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Richelle Robinson6-1, 6-2
2025-06-12vs DBaker-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Meta Kuehn6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKellianne White vs Kim Hutter6-3, 6-1
2025-06-10vs JORegan-HRWon 30
W#1 SinglesBecki Cleveland vs Doreen Hostetler7-5, 6-4
W#2 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Laurie Truschel6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBay Scott vs Dana Powers3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-03vs CPeterson-HVCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesYolanda Deaver vs Cecily Peterson7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBay Scott vs Elizabeth Yancy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesBecki Cleveland vs Caroline Carrico6-1, 6-1
2025-05-24vs MLong-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesKellianne White vs Susan Brogden6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBecki Cleveland vs Anna Fadel1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesEdith Becerra vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-2, 6-3
2025-05-20vs PDavis-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesBay Scott vs Pamela Howell-Davis2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Yolanda Deaver
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.12
Kellianne White
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Becki Cleveland
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.79
Edith Becerra
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.57
Kellie Johnson
published
2.41
Bay Scott
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Yolanda Deaver + Kellianne White5552% games+7.5% vs expected
Becki Cleveland + Kellianne White6460% gamesnot enough data
Yolanda Deaver + Edith Becerra224 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Yolanda Deaver213 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Kellie Johnson213 matchesnot enough data
Bay Scott + Becki Cleveland123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Yolanda Deaver
203W–94L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%14%86%
3.14
3
Kellianne White
171W–128L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
3
Becki Cleveland
113W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Edith Becerra
35W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79
Kellie Johnson
18W–24L career · no lines in 2025
0%30%70%
2.57
3
Bay Scott
68W–136L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.