Teams

PDavis-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-03vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Cecily Peterson0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Deborah Hertzog0-6, 0-6
2025-06-17Split 11
W#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Leslie Jackson6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Debbie Baker0-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs MLong-ENOLost 12
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Anna Fadel1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Susan Brogden2-6, 1-6
W#3 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Judith Hagopian-Edwards6-0, 6-2
2025-06-03vs JORegan-HRLost 03
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Kim Cabelka2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJonda Young vs Laurie Truschel0-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesVickie Gibbs vs Jan ORegan0-6, 4-6
2025-05-31vs MLong-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Mary T Long4-6, 4-6
2025-05-20vs YDeaver-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Bay Scott6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesJonda Young vs Valerie Williams6-1, 6-3
2025-05-18vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#1 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Deborah Hertzog3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Michelle Koeneke1-6, 1-6
2025-05-06vs DBaker-ENOSplit 11
W#2 SinglesCamille Blommer vs Kim Hutter6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Debbie Baker1-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Camille Blommer
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.59
Matalaba Napier
published
2.59
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 20% · published 3
2.36
Jonda Young
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.35
Vickie Gibbs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jonda Young + Pamela Howell-Davis2637% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Camille Blommer
73W–74L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.80
Matalaba Napier
13W–25L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
120W–146L career · 5 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
2.5
Jonda Young
93W–183L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Vickie Gibbs
55W–75L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.