Teams

MLong-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 55 & Over · 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-08vs JORegan-HRWon 20
W#2 SinglesSusan Brogden vs Glenda Dinyari6-2, 6-4
W#3 SinglesMary T Long vs Jan ORegan7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-06-17vs YDeaver-ENOSplit 11
W#1 SinglesLaurie Rechholtz vs Kellianne White6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Yolanda Deaver1-6, 2-6
2025-06-10vs PDavis-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Vickie Gibbs0-6, 2-6
2025-06-03vs DBaker-ENOSplit 11
L#2 SinglesLaurie Rechholtz vs Meta Kuehn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Janet Ranheim7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-31vs PDavis-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesLaurie Rechholtz vs Matalaba Napier6-1, 6-1
2025-05-24vs YDeaver-ENOLost 01
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Edith Becerra2-6, 3-6
2025-05-20vs JORegan-HRSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLaurie Rechholtz vs Kim Cabelka7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Doreen Hostetler6-3, 7-5
2025-05-06vs CPeterson-HVCCLost 02
L#2 SinglesRichelle Robinson vs Michelle Koeneke3-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesJudith Hagopian-Edwards vs Elizabeth Yancy1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Singles 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Anna Fadel
published 3.5
2.92
Susan Brogden
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Laurie Rechholtz
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.78
Mary T Long
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.71
Richelle Robinson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Anna Fadel
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Susan Brogden
10W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Laurie Rechholtz
40W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Mary T Long
27W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Richelle Robinson
125W–138L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.