Teams

SFV - Simply Smashing 3.0

2025 Adult 18 SFV Spring · SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for SFV 18 & Over - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Tia Ayers
published
2.90
Bethany Nelson
published 3
2.89
Kat Kim
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.89
Lindsay Reid
published
2.89
Cindy Larson
published 3
2.88
Norma Jean
published
2.86
Aline MacK
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.81
Ashley Bol
published 3
2.79
Cindy Shih
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Eliza Llobrera
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
En Jang
published
2.72
Diana Galaviz
published 3
2.65
Molly Jackson
published
2.65
Zenaida Siojo
published
2.63
Allison Mac Ewan
published 3
2.60
Vanessa Nelson
published
2.40
Liyan Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tia Ayers + Bethany Nelson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tia Ayers
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.12
3
Bethany Nelson
19W–17L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Kat Kim
50W–41L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Lindsay Reid
12W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Cindy Larson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Norma Jean
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.88
3
Aline MacK
71W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Ashley Bol
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.81
3
Cindy Shih
69W–99L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Eliza Llobrera
121W–89L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
En Jang
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Diana Galaviz
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Molly Jackson
14W–16L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
Zenaida Siojo
9W–17L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Allison Mac Ewan
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vanessa Nelson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
2.60
Liyan Wang
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.