Teams

Hit It From the Backhand

2026 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - BOISE · TV

22 players · average NTRP 3.83 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-28vs No Strings AttachedWon 20
W#1 DoublesJacob Roberts / Tiffany Roberts vs Jenny Grunke / Eric Sauder6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMatt Locke / Stacey Walker vs Margie Waddel / Keith Hudson6-1, 6-0
2026-08-26vs Loose StringsLost 01
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Malmstrom / Scott Anders vs Kristina Kingery / Matt Sheils5-7, 4-6
2026-08-24vs The MixfitsWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatt Locke / Tiffany Roberts vs Averi Lopez / Noe Lopez6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRick Roby / Hailey Smith vs Nathan Hines / Erin Kohler4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-17vs Strung Out 7.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBob Haycock / Robyn Roby vs Bryan Escobedo / Adair Holden6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTiffany Roberts / Trever Browne vs Joshua Cramer / Amy Hanson5-7, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WTF 20262060035
2Hit It From the Backhand2042433
3The Mixfits1142446
4Loose Strings1133853
5Mixed Hitter1133865
6Strung Out 7.50112423
7Domin-Asians & Friends0103636
8Until Smooth02151166

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Matt Locke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
4.09
Jacob Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.02
Trever Browne
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.00
Debbie Merritt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.93
Brian Johnson
published 4
3.93
Rick Roby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.92
Fazal Shariff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Jon Linzbach
published 4
3.88
Connor Rice
published 4
3.86
Mel Jackson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Robyn Roby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Nicole Hancock
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.73
Scott Anders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Bob Haycock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Erin Perry
published 4
3.47
Stacey Walker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Hailey Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Tiffany Roberts
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Suzanne Malmstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.27
Jon Hancock
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.26
Kiley Holt
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jeff Malmstrom
published 0
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Roby + Kiley Holt12059% games+17.4% vs expected
Jacob Roberts + Tiffany Roberts11163% games+7.4% vs expected
Brian Johnson + Stacey Walker6160% games+4.5% vs expected
Rick Roby + Robyn Roby241554% games+3.9% vs expected
Jon Hancock + Nicole Hancock182150% games−7.0% vs expected
Jeff Malmstrom + Suzanne Malmstrom6356% gamesnot enough data
Trever Browne + Debbie Merritt5164% gamesnot enough data
Brian Johnson + Robyn Roby4165% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matt Locke
59W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
4.15
4
Jacob Roberts
91W–24L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%26%74%
4.09
4
Trever Browne
149W–114L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
4
Debbie Merritt
205W–117L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
4.00
4
Brian Johnson
207W–115L career · no lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.93
4
Rick Roby
279W–89L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Fazal Shariff
162W–71L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Jon Linzbach
113W–64L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Connor Rice
23W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Mel Jackson
94W–42L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
4
Robyn Roby
394W–188L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Nicole Hancock
137W–105L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Scott Anders
96W–121L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
3.5
Bob Haycock
128W–78L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.56
4
Erin Perry
68W–102L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
3.5
Stacey Walker
72W–53L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Hailey Smith
88W–105L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Tiffany Roberts
59W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Suzanne Malmstrom
108W–111L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Jon Hancock
55W–65L career · 5 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Kiley Holt
43W–65L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
0
Jeff Malmstrom
16W–12L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.