Teams

Augustine 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PM

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Saroj Patnaik2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaleb Evans vs Sean Jones2-6, 2-6
2025-10-01vs LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesJason Lewis vs Kevin VanVooren6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLuke Mills vs William Davis4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Noah Carlson3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Brant Davenport6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaleb Evans vs Rod Mendoza2-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesRyan Augustine vs JJ Flores1-6, 2-6
2025-09-17vs Vorys 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 30
W#1 SinglesLuke Mills vs John Little7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Chip Roth6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Mike Vorys6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesLuke Mills vs Saroj Patnaik2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Sean Jones6-4, 7-6
W#3 SinglesCaleb Evans vs Jack Monroe3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-27vs LeFevre 3.0M Fall Singles Wed PMWon 21
W#1 SinglesJason Lewis vs David Vick6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLuke Mills vs Kevin VanVooren5-7, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAnders Gustavsson vs Gene LeFevre5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLuke Mills vs Brant Davenport3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRyan Augustine vs Carl Mattacola0-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesJackson Honeycutt vs Steven Holtzman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men Fall Singles Wed PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Jason Lewis
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.98
Luke Mills
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.89
Jackson Honeycutt
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.84
Anders Gustavsson
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.49
Caleb Evans
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.35
Ryan Augustine
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jason Lewis
29W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Luke Mills
9W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%43%
2.98
Jackson Honeycutt
15W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Anders Gustavsson
9W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Caleb Evans
4W–6L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.49
Ryan Augustine
2W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.