Teams

Samuell Grand/Musick-Thornton W4.0T

2026 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

20 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-06-04vs DAC/Stephanian-Vandenberg W4.0TWon 10
W#2 SinglesKatherine Ratliff vs Ashley Carothers6-3, 6-1
2026-05-14Won 10
W#2 SinglesKatherine Ratliff vs Krystle McNew7-5, 6-4
2026-05-08vs DCC/Crouch-Lee W4.0TWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Flournoy / Kristen Moran vs Emily Lee / Kari Prine3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-07vs Chandlers Landing/Owenby W4.0TLost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Nammari / Emily Hoppers vs Debra Wood / Jeannie Westmoreland3-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.02
Sarah Sparling
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.00
Laura Reynolds
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.95
Liza Ellis
published
3.92
Gina Manning
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Gale Dunleavy
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.88
Maureen McCaffrey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.80
Lisa Nammari
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.79
Ann Thornton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Marci Addington
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.72
Andrea Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.71
Suzanne Flournoy
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.70
Courtney Kunz
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.68
Christine Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Diane Hashimoto
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 30% · published 4
3.66
Tanya Musick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.63
Erica Whiteway
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Katherine Ratliff
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.42
Cassi Cole
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Emily Hoppers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristen Moran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Rogers + Tanya Musick8259% games+9.5% vs expected
Ann Thornton + Laura Reynolds11366% games+9.4% vs expected
Lisa Nammari + Suzanne Flournoy4261% games−6.4% vs expected
Tanya Musick + Sarah Sparling4356% gamesnot enough data
Christine Rogers + Erica Whiteway2453% gamesnot enough data
Cassi Cole + Erica Whiteway3255% gamesnot enough data
Erica Whiteway + Andrea Taylor4156% gamesnot enough data
Marci Addington + Courtney Kunz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah Sparling
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
4.02
Laura Reynolds
19W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
4.00
Liza Ellis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.95
Gina Manning
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
Gale Dunleavy
11W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Maureen McCaffrey
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.88
Lisa Nammari
25W–10L career · 8 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ann Thornton
30W–9L career · 10 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Marci Addington
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Andrea Taylor
51W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Suzanne Flournoy
11W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Courtney Kunz
10W–4L career · 7 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Christine Rogers
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Diane Hashimoto
15W–27L career · 10 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Tanya Musick
17W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Erica Whiteway
33W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.63
Katherine Ratliff
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
44%56%<1%
3.52
4
Cassi Cole
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
3.42
Emily Hoppers
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Kristen Moran
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.