Teams

Mo.Sheets18T

2024 Capital Tri-Level 18 & Over · 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-31Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Strickland / Jessica Willetts vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-19vs Al.DeMacy18TWon 10
W#2 DoublesLowry Liggon / Jessica Willetts vs Elizabeth Rupert / Katie Warren6-2, 6-1
2024-06-25vs Ma.Cambo18TWon 10
W#3 DoublesAmy Cantando / Jessica Willetts vs Kalli Unthank / Callan Fike6-1, 6-3
2024-06-20vs St.Grose18T3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Strickland / Jessica Willetts vs Stacy Grose / Megan Black6-0, 6-2
2024-05-28vs Bl.Leippe18T2.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesJessica Willetts / Karen Bornhofen vs Allison Dugan / Jane Bossert6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5-3.0-3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Melissa DeLorme
published 4
3.83
Lowry Liggon
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published 4
3.75
Stephanie Ferrell
published
3.61
Rachel Brown
published
3.59
Emily Slater
published
3.52
Jessica Willetts
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Anna Kouba
published 3.5
2.98
Ingrid Holscher
published
2.95
Lindsay Strickland
published
2.94
Julia Hughes
published
2.89
Amy Cantando
published 3
2.70
Karen Bornhofen
published
Kerry Ruggieri
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Brown + Emily Slater3349% games+3.6% vs expected
Lowry Liggon + Jessica Willetts404 matchesnot enough data
Amy Cantando + Karen Bornhofen213 matchesnot enough data
Lowry Liggon + Melissa DeLorme303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Melissa DeLorme
87W–42L career · no lines in 2024
<1%52%48%
3.99
4
Lowry Liggon
134W–36L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Stephanie Ferrell
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
3.75
Rachel Brown
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Emily Slater
22W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%26%74%
3.59
3.5
Jessica Willetts
73W–18L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Anna Kouba
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.24
Ingrid Holscher
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.98
Lindsay Strickland
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.95
Julia Hughes
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Amy Cantando
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Karen Bornhofen
10W–7L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
2.70
Kerry Ruggieri
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.