Teams

BC-Landry

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 4.0 Women

20 players · average NTRP 3.76 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-24vs EDG-Just Play!!! HummerLost 14
L#1 DoublesPauline Snowden / Dana Landry vs Nancy Chan / Renee Waltz0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesNicole Hill vs Marcie Glenn2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKris Stimpson / Ann Imus vs Kyoko Imai / Greta Dedmon6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCarlisle Quill vs Lacie West3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLauren Fisher / Claudia Hung vs Kathleen Nolan / Marie MacKey6-3, 0-6, 0-1
2024-05-17vs CP-LaunLost 23
W#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Katherine Walker vs Judy Greenstein / Mindy Marquart6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCarlisle Quill vs Helen Chiang3-6, 3-1
L#2 DoublesClaudia Hung / Lauren Fisher vs Kimberly Skorupa / Tracy Qi0-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesHelen Lee vs Nadine Ramstead5-7, 2-0
L#3 DoublesPauline Snowden / Karen Dunlop vs Laura Laun / Anna Duff6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2024-05-10vs TCSP-Hits Different-BursiekLost 23
L#1 DoublesClaudia Hung / Lauren Fisher vs Catherine Bursiek / Suzanne Kolenski2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesAnna Graves vs Krista Philbrick1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Pryde / Melissa Kaptik vs Pamela Kraus / Courtney Stiefel6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesMonica Norris vs Rachel Smith0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Katherine Walker vs Amy Pavelich / Alyssa Grundmeyer2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-05-03vs BAIN-GraebnerWon 31
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kaptik / Natalie Pryde vs Joanne Franklin / Fatima Wallin6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKris Stimpson / Ann Imus vs Susanne Neupauer / Adrienne Crowley6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesHelen Lee vs Amanda Bast6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesDana Landry / Michelle Watson vs Stephanie Page / Eleanor Gray4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-04-26vs STC-Bishop Nelson & PartnersWon 32
L#1 DoublesNatalie Pryde / Melissa Kaptik vs Dana Skotdal / Kathleen Green6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMonica Norris vs Genevieve Morton2-6, 3-1
W#2 DoublesJanice Hostetler / Pauline Snowden vs Tina L Garcia / Sarah McKinney2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAnna Graves vs Molly Bishop6-4, 2-2
W#3 DoublesKris Stimpson / Jennifer Johnson vs Chelsea Schanno / Kieran Oaksmith6-3, 6-4
2024-04-25vs STC-KnoxLost 23
W#1 DoublesMelissa Kaptik / Pauline Snowden vs Ginger Knox / Kanjamat Mullally6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesHelen Lee vs Cassandra Johnston5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Janice Hostetler vs Patricia McKay / Alison Winfield6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMonica Norris vs Molly Fort3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKris Stimpson / Ann Imus vs Julie Bouscaren / Melissa Jones2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-04-12vs AYTC-WolsonWon 32
L#1 DoublesNatalie Pryde / Dana Landry vs Debra White / Yao Chen4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMelissa Kaptik vs Katie Patchin2-6, 1-4
W#2 DoublesJanice Hostetler / Katherine Walker vs Patricia Carow / Alexandra Ryan3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMonica Norris vs Robin Freedman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBrandy Fertig / Claudia Hung vs Evelyn Bozzuti / Sherri Wolson6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-05vs TCSP-Shot Takers-KnollLost 23
W#1 DoublesNatalie Pryde / Dana Landry vs Teresa Graff / Janie DiMartino7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMonica Norris vs Jennifer Zell2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMichelle Lin / Michelle Watson vs Jenny Dire / Lisa Hofferber5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesNicole Hill vs Nancy Knoll4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnna Graves / Helen Lee vs Lauren Slavin Conroy / Lori Moriarty5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Natalie Pryde
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
Brandy Fertig
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Michelle Watson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Melissa Kaptik
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.69
Kris Stimpson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.69
Janice Hostetler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Monica Norris
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.56
Pauline Snowden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.53
Claudia Hung
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.52
Michelle Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.51
Carlisle Quill
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.45
Anna Graves
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 10% · published 3.5
3.45
Dana Landry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Ann Imus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.31
Nicole Hill
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 44% · published 3.5
3.22
Katherine Walker
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.20
Helen Lee
usually #2 Singles 78%, also #1 Singles 11% · published 3.5
3.15
Lauren Fisher
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.00
Karen Dunlop
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Jennifer Johnson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie Pryde + Melissa Kaptik5254% games+2.9% vs expected
Kris Stimpson + Ann Imus13953% games+2.3% vs expected
Janice Hostetler + Melissa Kaptik4157% games−0.4% vs expected
Michelle Lin + Michelle Watson10551% games−0.7% vs expected
Dana Landry + Natalie Pryde241853% games−0.7% vs expected
Karen Dunlop + Kris Stimpson171254% games−2.6% vs expected
Pauline Snowden + Michelle Watson2743% games−4.9% vs expected
Janice Hostetler + Ann Imus2343% games−5.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Natalie Pryde
112W–82L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.96
4
Brandy Fertig
58W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
4
Michelle Watson
49W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Melissa Kaptik
62W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Kris Stimpson
57W–48L career · 4 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Janice Hostetler
36W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Monica Norris
30W–41L career · 5 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Pauline Snowden
23W–45L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
4
Claudia Hung
21W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.53
4
Michelle Lin
27W–23L career · 1 line in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Carlisle Quill
15W–11L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Anna Graves
103W–45L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Dana Landry
93W–84L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Ann Imus
79W–67L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Nicole Hill
71W–88L career · 9 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Katherine Walker
44W–35L career · 7 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Helen Lee
45W–71L career · 9 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Lauren Fisher
19W–20L career · 8 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Karen Dunlop
45W–46L career · 1 line in 2024
48%52%<1%
3.00
Jennifer Johnson
20W–9L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.