Teams

LHCC 4

2022 Foothills Combo Doubles - 40 & over · 6.5 Combo Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.40 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-13vs ShokesFuller/CCC/foothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesAshley Stahlschmidt / Meghan Young vs Shannon Fuller / Charlotte Hartman5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Lovern / Jennifer Graham vs Karen Shokes / Kelli Schmidt3-6, 2-6
2022-10-06vs Gates/CRCC/FoothillsSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRyan Lovern / Ashley Stahlschmidt vs Susan Davis / Kay Lawson5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTisha Zagaroli / Jennifer Graham vs Alicia Brown / Michelle Huffman6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-09-29vs ShokesFuller/CCC/foothillsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTheresa Huggins / Tisha Zagaroli vs Maria Sherrill / Elise Wright6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJennifer Graham / Ashley Stahlschmidt vs Corinna Driscoll / Shannon Fuller4-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-09-25vs Gates/CRCC/FoothillsWon 10
W#3 DoublesTisha Zagaroli / Meghan Young vs Anne-Lindsay Beall / Jodi Sanders7-6, 6-7, 1-0
2022-09-15vs Place/HCP/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesRyan Lovern / Wendy Walker vs Cori Peters / Ellen Stupka3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAndrea Banks / Ashley Stahlschmidt vs Chris Summers / Suzi Moore0-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-09-08vs LHCC 3Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTisha Zagaroli / Meghan Young vs Marsha Diamonti / Mindy Bolick2-6, 6-7
2022-09-01vs Kim/RBCC/FoothillsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer East / Meghan Young vs Misha Ahern / DeAnna Finger1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRyan Lovern / Marsha White vs Mitzi Arrowood / Lisa Bograd6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Tisha Zagaroli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.35
Meghan Young
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Ryan Lovern
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Banks
published 3.5
2.99
Theresa Huggins
published
2.95
Ashley Stahlschmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Wendy Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ashley Stahlschmidt + Tisha Zagaroli6556% gamesnot enough data
Meghan Young + Ryan Lovern213 matchesnot enough data
Meghan Young + Tisha Zagaroli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Tisha Zagaroli
149W–88L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Meghan Young
165W–90L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Ryan Lovern
79W–47L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Andrea Banks
8W–5L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Theresa Huggins
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Ashley Stahlschmidt
100W–100L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
2.95
Wendy Walker
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.