Teams

SRYC - DiSanti

2024 Singles League 18 & Over-GC · Women 2.5

5 players · average NTRP / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-12-11vs BBTC Smith 2.5 SinglesWon 20
W#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Pam Berdine6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Leslie Johnson6-0, 6-1
2024-12-04vs OSTC - MaloneLost 12
L#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Carlie Saylor4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Kaelin Vegas6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Sarah Malone4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-12-03vs TOCC MitchellWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Katherine Swetman6-0, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Lindsey OConnell6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Shari Newman6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2024-11-25vs TOCC MitchellWon 10
W#2 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Ashley Gunn6-3, 6-2
2024-11-04vs Gartman-BiloxiWon 30
W#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Beth Seymour6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Rebecca Thornton6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Rebecca Atchison7-5, 6-4
2024-10-30Won 20
W#2 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Jennifer Mitchell6-0, 6-1
W#3 SinglesTracy Jackson-Wilson vs Nicole Rivera6-0, 6-1
2024-10-28vs BBTC Smith 2.5 SinglesWon 21
W#1 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Elan Buckley6-0, 6-1
L#2 SinglesStephenie Baker vs Dana Delvescovo6-7, 4-6
W#3 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Leslie Johnson6-4, 6-4
2024-10-21vs Gartman-BiloxiSplit 11
W#2 SinglesKaty Boyer vs Melissa Gartman6-2, 7-5
L#3 SinglesLacey Paquin vs Janet Blythe1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SRYC - DiSanti6216820177
2OSTC - Malone53141023179
3BBTC Smith 2.5 Singles4312921168
4TOCC Mitchell44141022191
5Biloxi-Robinson Singles 2.5 Fall 20241751938248

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.46
Katy Boyer
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
2.40
Stephenie Baker
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.37
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.25
Lacey Paquin
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Mary Anne DiSanti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lacey Paquin + Stephenie Baker191852% games+5.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katy Boyer
37W–34L career · 8 lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.46
Stephenie Baker
54W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%77%23%
2.40
Tracy Jackson-Wilson
29W–25L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%83%17%
2.37
Lacey Paquin
26W–40L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Mary Anne DiSanti
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.