Teams

CV-Sun City PD/Oswald & Kim

2023 USTA Adult 40 & Over - CV · CV Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Rebecca Jasmine vs Ailee Robertson / Andrea Howland - Cobb4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMaria Himelman / Joyce Westerdahl vs Janice Savidge / Teresa Urquhart6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesHeidi Kelly / Jill Delaney vs Jennifer Ruddell / Alethea Platis2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAnn Oswald / Blair Stone vs Tammy Roach / Meg Zoretic5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoyce Westerdahl / Gianna Riley vs Traci Hylland / Barbara Maher6-1, 7-6
2023-02-11vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnn Oswald / Blair Stone vs Gillen Keogh / Janet Gugliotto4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBarbara McDonald / Blair Stone vs Barbara Wood / Caroline Cavelti3-6, 3-6
2023-01-21vs CV-Palm Desert TC/SkoneWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Markowitz / Joyce Westerdahl vs Suzy Skone / Gillen Keogh6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJill Delaney / Barbara McDonald vs Suzette Willetts / Caroline Cavelti6-4, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Gianna Riley
published
3.43
Judy Theriault
published
3.42
Blair Stone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Jill Delaney
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Ann Tennyson
published 3.5
3.30
Heidi Kelly
published
3.29
Maria Himelman
published
3.26
Cheryl Yasis
published 3.5
3.20
Barbara Holmsten
published 3.5
2.85
Kelly Walecki
published
2.70
Ann Oswald
published 3
Joyce Westerdahl
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Jasmine
published
Susan Markowitz
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Gianna Riley
6W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.77
Judy Theriault
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Blair Stone
115W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%71%28%
3.42
3.5
Jill Delaney
102W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
3.5
Ann Tennyson
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.36
Heidi Kelly
28W–19L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Maria Himelman
14W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Cheryl Yasis
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Barbara Holmsten
4W–10L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.20
Kelly Walecki
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
2.85
3
Ann Oswald
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
2.70
Joyce Westerdahl
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Jasmine
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Markowitz
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.